Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: LESH DRILLING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LESH DRILLING in 113 S HIGHWAY 85, AULT, CO 80610 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 339908964.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lesh Drilling for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lesh Drilling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LESH DRILLING
Site address
113 S HIGHWAY 85
City
AULT
State
CO
ZIP
80610
Mailing
P.O. BOX 56, AULT, CO 80610
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  (Note:  As referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d)):    (a)Lesh Drilling at 113 S. Highway 85, Ault, CO 80610:  On and before August 19th, 2014, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator was trained and certified to operate the Yale forklift, model GLP960ZGNGAE097, serial number AB75B137674. The conditions exposed employees to struck-by hazards.    Abatement Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under this paragraph are identical to those set forth at 1910.178(l).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also included a hazardous chemicals list and methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks. (Note:  As referenced by the note contained in 1926.59):     (a)Lesh Drilling at 113 S. Highway 85, Ault, CO 80610:  On and before August 19th, 2014, the employer did not establish a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also included a hazardous chemicals list and methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, had not been developed for employee exposures, such as but not limited, to the following:       (1)Chlorine;      (2)Gasoline and Diesel Fuel
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area:   (a)Lesh Drilling at 113 S. Highway 85, Ault, CO 80610: On and before August 19th, 2014, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area such as but not limited to chlorine. (Note:  As referenced by the note contained in 1926.59):    Abatement Note:     (a)Employees shall be informed of:     (1)Any operation in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present; and,     (2)The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and material safety data sheets required by this section.     (b)Employee training shall include at least:     (1)Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.);     (2)The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area;     (3)The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used;     (4)The details of the hazardous communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition when it was necessary by reason of the hazards of the processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:    (a)Lesh Drilling at 113 S. Highway 85, Ault, CO 80610:  On and before August 19th, 2014, the employer did not provide and require the following personal protective equipment which was necessary for the employees to safely work in the following circumstances:    1)  While working on and around the derricks:  gloves, safety glasses, safety shoes, and hard hats;    2)  While working more than 6 feet high on a vertical derrick: a retractable lanyard with a full body harness;    3)  While handling materials such as pipe:  gloves, safety glasses, safety shoes, and hard hat;    4)  While handling equipment such as pumps:  gloves, safety glasses, safety shoes, and hard hat; and    5)  While handling chlorine and other corrosive chemicals:  an air-purifying regulator, splash proof goggles, a face shield, chemical-resistant gloves, and protection from skin exposure such as an apron.    Conditions exposed employees to fall hazards, eye injuries, foot injuries, concussions, skin abrasions, and chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.405 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, or receptacles had live parts normally exposed to employee contact, and were not located at least 8 feet above the floor:    (a)Lesh Drilling at 113 S. Highway 85, Ault, CO 80610:  On and before August 19th, 2014, the employer allowed the use of a light fixture in the walkway of the shop with an unprotected lamp that measured approximately 71 inches from the floor.  The conditions exposed employees to cut hazards and 120 volt electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339908964.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.