Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: HAMILTON SERVICES INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HAMILTON SERVICES INC. in 828 64TH STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11220 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 339914517.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hamilton Services INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hamilton Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
828 64TH STREET
City
BROOKLYN
State
NY
ZIP
11220
Mailing
6402 FORT HAMILTON PARKWAY, BROOKLYN, NY 11219
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:     a) 4th floor:     An employee used an electric powered angle grinder to do framing work. The angle grinder was designed to accommodate a guard for the cutting wheel, and was not equipped with such guard when in use. On or about 08/20/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2015
Abate by
Feb 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors.     a) 4th floor:     An employee used an electric powered angle grinder to do framing work. The grinder was connected to an extension cord, which was routed to a nearby outlet device and was not provided with a ground fault circuit interrupter. On or about 08/20/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.502 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(2): All other covers were not capable of supporting, without failure, at least twice the weight of the employees, equipment, and materials that maybe be imposed on the cover at any one time.     a) 2nd floor, roof setback:       Styrofoam covers for HVAC duct openings on the floor were not capable of supporting, without failure, at least twice the weight of the employees, equipment, and materials that maybe be imposed on the cover at any one time. An employee stepped on the cover, which it broke, and fell approximately 15 feet through the duct opening to the 1st floor. On or about 08/14/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.502 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(3): All covers were not secured when installed so as to prevent accidental displacement by the wind, equipment, or employees:       a) 2nd floor, roof setback:       Styrofoam covers for HVAC duct openings on the floor were not secured when installed so as to prevent accidental displacement by the wind, equipment, or employees. On or about 08/14/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.502 I04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(i)(4): All covers were not color coded or marked with the word "HOLE" or "COVER" to provide warning of the hazard:    a) 2nd floor, roof setback:    Styrofoam covers for HVAC duct openings on the floor were not color coded or marked with the word "HOLE" or "COVER" to provide warning of the fall hazard. An employee stepped on a cover, which broke it, and fell approximately 15 feet through the opening to 1st floor. On or about 08/14/14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339914517.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.