AUSTIN, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: NOEL ORTIZ AMAYA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NOEL ORTIZ AMAYA in 11078 DESSAU RD, AUSTIN, TX 78754 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339915365.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOEL ORTIZ AMAYA
- Site address
- 11078 DESSAU RD
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78754
- Mailing
- 1103 W SOUTHCROSS BLVD, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78211
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not provided when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: On or about August 22, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that each employee engaged in construction work while on the four tier scaffolding system were required to where safety glasses when hazards to the eyes from brick fragments and tools were present.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Cross braces were used as a means of access and egress: On or about August 22, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees accessed the second and third tiers by climbing the cross braces where the employer did not ensure that there was a ladders installed on the four tier tubular welded frame scaffolding, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: On or about August 22, 2014, a eight foot fiberglass A-Frame ladder was used improperly where it was leaned up against a scaffold, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about August 22, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that guardrails were installed on the second and third levels of a four tier tubular welded frame scaffold system, exposing the employees on the scaffold to a fall hazard of up to approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339915365.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.