Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: DAN WENZL

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DAN WENZL in 418 N WEBB ROAD, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68801 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 339918369.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch DAN Wenzl for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DAN Wenzl is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAN WENZL
Site address
418 N WEBB ROAD
City
GRAND ISLAND
State
NE
ZIP
68801
Mailing
1723 N KRUSE AVENUE, GRAND ISLAND, NE 68803
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 05609015C730

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)      Jobsite: The employer is failing to develop or implement a hazard communication program which includes a list of hazardous chemicals and an explanation of the labeling system and SDSs.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 05609015C730

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)       Jobsite: The employer is failing to provide employees, engaged in the task of concrete pouring, training to recognize, evaluate and control exposure to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, carbon monoxide and respirable silica.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 05609015C730

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):       Jobsite: On or about July 29, 2014, the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment by a competent person to identify and correct safety and health hazards. Employees were exposed to health hazards, including but not limited to exposure to Carbon Monoxide.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.55 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 05609015C730

29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists:       Jobsite: On or about July 29, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that employee exposures did not exceed the 8 hour time weighted average (TWA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 ppm for CO. Four employees engaged in concrete pouring operations were exposed, and at least one of them was hospitalized, as a result of an 8-hour TWA exposure of 86.3 ppm, which is approximately 1.73 times the PEL.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.55 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2014
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 05609015C730

29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure(s):       Jobsite: On or about July 29, 2014, the employer failed to use control measures to prevent employee exposure to carbon dioxide (CO) at or above 50 ppm over on 8 hour time weighted average. Four employees engaged in concrete pouring operations were exposed, and at least one of them was hospitalized, as a result of an 8-hour TWA exposure of 86.3 ppm, which is approximately 1.73 times the PEL.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339918369.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.