BROOKFIELD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: STEIN MART, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of STEIN MART, INC. in 16950 W BLUE MOUND ROAD, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 (NAICS 452112). OSHA activity number 339920969.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEIN MART, INC.
- Site address
- 16950 W BLUE MOUND ROAD
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53005
- Mailing
- 16950 W BLUE MOUND ROAD, BROOKFIELD, WI 53005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 452112
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. (a) Exit access was approximately 23 inches in width within the aisle of the office area and employee break room. (b) Exit access was approximately 18 inches in width within the aisle of the shipping and receiving back room.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $3400
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.1030 C01 II A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the exposure determination required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2): (a) The employer's Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan did not indicate whether the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens applied to all or some managers, store associates, and/or other job classifications.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4250
- — C (S) $4250
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.1030 C01 II B
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the schedule and method of implementation for 29 CFR 1910.1030(f), Hepatitis B Vaccination and Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up: (a) The employer's "Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan" did not include any provision of prophylactic hepatitis B vaccines. (b) The employer's "Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan" did not include adequate follow-up procedures in the event of an exposure incident in that it did not include provision of an investigation to identify a source individual, and obtain permission for testing of the source individual's blood, nor did it address provision of free medical consultation and treatment for the exposed individual.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 II C
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(C): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not include the procedure for the evaluation of circumstances surrounding exposure incidents, as required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3)(i): (a) The employer's "Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan" did not include any procedure for evaluation of circumstances surrounding exposure incidents.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D03 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(3)(i): When there was occupational exposure, the employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, appropriate personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, gloves, gowns, laboratory coats, face shields, masks, eye proretection, and mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, pocket masks, or other ventilation devices: (a) There was not adequate provision of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), such as shoe coverings and impermeable gloves, for workers performing clean-up of a blood spill.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4250
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.1030 D04 II A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(ii)(A): Contaminated work surfaces were not decontaminated with an appropriate disinfectant immediately or as soon as feasible when surfaces were overtly contaminated or after any spill of blood or other potentially infectious materials: (a) On or around August 20, 2014, when a blood spill incident occurred in the fitting room area, store workers were provided with two partially stocked Bloodborne Pathogen clean-up kits, which did not contain appropriate disinfectant to decontaminate affected surfaces.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii): The employer's training program did not contain the minimum elements required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A) through (g)(2)(vii)(N): (a) With respect to bloodborne pathogens, adequate training was not provided. Among the elements not covered by the training were the following: - access was not provided to a copy of the standard 29 CFR 1910.1030 - explanation of the epidemiology and symptoms of bloodborne diseases - information on the hepatitis B vaccine, including information about its efficacy, safety, method of administration, the benefits of being vaccinated, and that the vaccine would be offered free of charge - an explanation of the procedure to follow if an exposure incident occurs, including the method of reporting the incident and the medical follow-up that would be made available - Information on the post-exposure evaluation and follow-up that the employer is required to provide for the employee following an exposure incident.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $4250
- — C (S) $4250
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.1030 G02 VIII
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(viii): The person conducting the bloodborne pathogen training was not knowledgeable in the subject matter covered by the elements contained in the training program as it related to the workplace that the training would address: (a) Bloodborne pathogen training was conducted by the Store Manager who was not sufficiently knowledgeable of bloodborne pathogen training elements.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Stein Mart, INC.
View Stein Mart, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 452112)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339920969.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.