Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: AGUILARES MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AGUILARES MASONRY in 6922 FORT BEND, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78222 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339922783.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aguilares Masonry for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aguilares Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AGUILARES MASONRY
Site address
6922 FORT BEND
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78222
Mailing
19394 K ST., SOMERSET, TX 78069
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employee working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about August 27, 2014, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard to the head while not wearing a protective helmet on ground level while handing up bricks to the upper level of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   On or about August 27, 2014, an employee was exposed to falls approximately 6.5 feet in height to the paved ground level below from a scaffold, which had only 2 out of 3 possible planks installed while employee was handing bricks up to the next level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  On or about August 27, 2014, an employee was exposed to fall hazard approximately 9.5 feet in height to paved ground level below while handing up bricks and standing on a scaffold platform that was less than 18 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  On or about August 27, 2014, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 9.5 feet in height to paved ground level below when handing up brick while standing on a scaffold that had been erected with the upright support poles placed directly on the mud sills.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2014
Abate by
Sep 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces and side brackets were used as a means of access:     On or about August 27, 2014, employees were exposed to falls approximately 9.5 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the 2nd level platform of the scaffold, which did not have a ladder for access and egress to and from the scaffold platforms, while handing bricks up to the next level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339922783.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.