Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RANDY MANGES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RANDY MANGES in 102 EMPIRE ST., MONTPELIER, OH 43543 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339925802.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Randy Manges for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Randy Manges is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RANDY MANGES
Site address
102 EMPIRE ST.
City
MONTPELIER
State
OH
ZIP
43543
Mailing
08304 CR 750, EDON, OH 43518
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by deenergizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:    A. Randy Manges DBA Manges Construction worksite located at 102 Empire St., Montpelier, Ohio: On or about August 28, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from electrical shock while operating the Genie S60 aerial lift in close proximity to the energized main electric service to the structure. Employees were installing steel siding near the single phase 400/120/240 volt service line.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn with a lanyard attached to the boom or basket while working from an aerial lift:     A. Randy Manges DBA Manges Construction worksite located at 102 Empire St., Montpelier, Ohio: On or about August 28, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were wearing fall protection while operating the Genie S-60 Aerial Lift. The exposed employees were installing metal siding on the south side of the commercial structure from the aforementioned aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 1, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.      A. Randy Manges DBA Manges Construction worksite located at 102 Empire St., Montpelier, Ohio: On or about August 28, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from falling approximately 24.00 feet to the lowest level while working on the roof. Employees were near the edge of the roof structure preparing to remove the gutter with no fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339925802.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.