FORT WORTH, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: PVI INDUSTRIES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PVI INDUSTRIES in 3209 GALVEZ AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76111 (NAICS 333414). OSHA activity number 339926123.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PVI INDUSTRIES
- Site address
- 3209 GALVEZ AVE.
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76111
- Mailing
- 3209 GALVEZ AVE., FORT WORTH, TX 76111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333414
- Employees
- 223
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
29 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards from non-rated lifting devices. On or about August 28, 2014, throughout the manufacturing facility, home-made lifting devices, home-made hooks and "C"-Hooks used to aid in the process of rigging up and/or moving material were not rated, inspected and certified.
Recent events (3)
- · 2 (S) $5355
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 B09
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction. On or about August 28, 2014, in the coating department, stacked and palletized tank components and trash receptacles were stored within 3 feet of the spray booth exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not at a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift. On or about August 28, 2014, in the coating department, class 3 liquids such as, but not limited to black flat low friction coating was stored inside the spray booth and exceeded the daily usage limit. There were approximately 5-10 one gallon containers of paint and other chemicals located in the paint booth exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $3825
- · C (S) $4500
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.107 G04
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(4): Spray finishing employees' clothing was left on the premises overnight and not kept in metal lockers: On or about August 28, 2014, in the coating department, tyvek paint suits in use by employees were being stored inside of the paint booth exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 G07
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): No smoking signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas: On or about August 28, 2014, in the coating department, "No Smoking" signs were not posted on the paint booth exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.146 C05 II
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(H): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i), but a written certification was not made before entry that the measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii) had been taken: On or about August 28, 2014, the employer failed to conduct a written certification before employees entered into permit required confined spaces exposing those employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.146 D04
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4): Provide the following equipment (specified in paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through (d)(4)(ix) of this section) at no cost to employees, maintain that equipment properly, and ensure that employees use that equipment properly: On or about August 28, 2014, employees entering permit required confined spaces were not provided with the required equipment to include but not limited to testing and monitoring equipment, communications equipment, emergency rescue equipment and/or a ladder exposing employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.146 D09
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): The employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and/or for preventing unauthorized entry. On or about August 28, 2014, rescue procedures were not developed and implemented for emergency rescue of employees from permit required confined spaces exposing employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.146 D05 I
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing conditions in the permit space. On or about August 28, 2014, prior to entry into permit required confined spaces, conditions were not evaluated by testing of those spaces to determine if acceptable conditions existed before entry exposing employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.146 D05 II
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(ii): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing or monitoring the permit space as necessary. On or about August 28, 2014, during entry into permit required confined spaces, conditions were not evaluated by testing of those spaces on a continuous basis to determine if acceptable conditions were maintained exposing employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.146 E01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit. On or about August 28, 2014, written entry permit(s) were not completed before employees entered into permit required confined spaces exposing those employees to atmospheric hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about August 28, 2014, the employer did not develop written lockout/tagout procedures for each type of equipment or machine located within the plant, to include but not limited to Punch press, Lathes, a De-coiler, Bridgeport Press Brake, and a Cincinnati Sheer. Employees performing maintenance, setup or servicing work were exposed to electrocution and/or amputation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $5355
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.147 D05
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5): Following the application of lockout devices to energy isolating devices, all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy was not relieved, disconnected, restrained, or otherwise rendered safe. And where there was a possibility of reaccumulation of stored energy to a hazardous level, verification of isolation was not continued until the servicing or maintenance was completed, or until the possibility of such accumulation no longer existed: On or about August 28, 2014, All energy sources were not relieved and/or disconnected when employees were required to service, setup or perform maintenance on machinery and/or equipment. Employees were exposed to electrocution and amputation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished: On or about August 28, 2014, authorized employees do not verify the isolation and/or de-energization of machines or equipment prior to performing maintenance, exposing them to electrocution and amputation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.179 E04
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(e)(4): Bridge truck(s) were not equipped with sweep(s) which extended below the top of the rail and projected in the front of the truck wheel(s). On or about August 28, 2014, rail sweeps were not installed on overhead bridge cranes to include but not limited to the P & H 7.5 Ton Overhead Bridge Crane, Serial # 6708, C-01, and the P & H Overhead crane, C-05, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4500
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section. On or about August 28, 2014, throughout the manufacturing facility, the employer failed to ensure that an annual inspection was conducted, documented and maintained on all cranes exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5355
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed. On or about August 28, 2014, throughout the manufacturing facility, the employer failed to ensure that monthly hook inspections were conducted monthly to include a certification record, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about August 28, 2014, point of operation guarding was not provided on production machines such as but not limited to two Press Brakes, a vertical belt sander, and two engine lathes exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5355
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.212 A03 III
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(iii): Special hand tools for placing and removing material(s) was not provided to permit easy handling of material without the operator placing a hand in the danger zone. On or about August 28, 2014, employees operating the Pacific Press brakes in the sheet metal department were not provided with special hand tools to control the material into the point of operation, exposing the employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $2,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections. On or about August 28, 2014, in the machine shop, the spindle end, nut and flange on the bench grinder were not guarded, exposing employees to struck-by or caught-by hazards from rotating parts or wheel breakage.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $2295
- · C (S) $2700
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work. On or about August 28, 2014, in the machine shop, the work rest was not installed and used on the Craftsman bench grinder, exposing employees to caught-by hazards from rotating parts.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. On or about August 28, 2014, in the machine shop, the tongue guard was not installed on the Craftsman bench grinder, exposing employees to caught-by hazards from rotating parts.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $2,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o). On or about August 28, 2014, in the maintenance shop, the pulley(s) on the Bridgeport drill located in the maintenance shop were not adequately guarded, exposing employees to caught-by hazards from rotating parts.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $2295
- · C (S) $2700
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o). On or about August 28, 2014, in the maintenance shop, the Bridgeport drill press was inadequately guarded, exposing employees to caught in hazards from the rotating belts.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: On or about August 28, 2014, in the machine shop, compressed air used for cleaning was not reduced to less than 30 psi, exposing employees to air embolisms and eyes and skin hazards from flying partials.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2700
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose. On or about August 28, 2014, electrical panel boxes including but not limited to the following were not effectively closed, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards. Instance a: In the compressor room, Dryer cover, 230 volt panel cover was missing; Instance b: In the final assembly on column 17, 3 phase 240 volt panel outside cover was missing; Instance c: In the tank shop, 240 volt electrical panel cover was missing; Instance d: In the sheet metal shop, 240 volt electrical panel box the cover was missing.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5355
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. On or about August 28, 2014, in the tank shop, an electrical cord on the bottom of the 220 volt electrical panel was not protected from direct pull to the terminal and/or internal wiring by a strain relief mechanism. The outer sheathing was pulled away from the terminal end exposing the internal wiring and exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1026 I05
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(5): The employer does not prohibit eating, drinking, smoking, chewing tobacco or gum, or applying cosmetics in regulated areas, or in areas where skin or eye contact with chromium (VI) occurs; or carry the products associated with these activities, or store such products in these areas. On or about August 28, 2014, in the tank shop, employees were allowed to eat and drink at their workstations where welding operations on stainless steel took place, exposing employees to the hazards of inhalation and ingestion of Hexavalent Chromium.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $6300
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. On or about August 28, 2014, in the maintenance shop, an eye wash facility was not readily available for the employees working with corrosive materials exposing them to chemical hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (O) $1000
- · Z (O) $1000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333414)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339926123.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.