Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BRADLEY USA, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BRADLEY USA, LLC in 3776 GREEN INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, ATLANTA, GA 30341 (NAICS 337121). OSHA activity number 339931289.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bradley USA, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bradley USA, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRADLEY USA, LLC
Site address
3776 GREEN INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30341
Mailing
3776 GREEN INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, ATLANTA, GA 30341
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337121
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided a spray booth for employees to use in the spray application of flammable liquids without providing automatic sprinklers on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): Where  respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided and required the use of negative pressure, half-face piece, air purifying respirators for employees performing spray application of chemicals in the spray booth and spray room but did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.   On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided and required the use of negative pressure, half-face piece, air purifying respirators for employees performing spray application of chemicals in the spray booth and spray room but did not provide a medical evaluation for those employees before they were required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided and required the use of negative pressure, half-face piece, air purifying respirators for employees performing spray application of chemicals in the spray booth and spray room but did not provide those employees with fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer did not provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace.   On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided and required the use of negative pressure, half-face piece, air purifying respirators for employees performing spray application of chemicals in the spray booth and spray room but did not provide respiratory protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer had provided a "Raymond Corporation" model 201-R30TT electric forklift for use by two employees and did not provide those employees with required information and training or otherwise evaluate the employees competence to operate the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.178 M03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(3): Unauthorized personnel were permitted to ride on powered industrial trucks.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer had provided a "Raymond Corporation" model 201-R30TT electric forklift used by operators to lift co-workers riding the forks on a pallet for the purposes of retrieving materials from elevated storage and constructing a spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.   On or about September 3, 2014 the employer provided a compressed air line measured at 50 p.s.i. in the spray booth for use by two employees for cleaning purposes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in cabinets, boxes, and fittings were not effectively closed.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer did not ensure that unused openings were effectively closed on the breaker box located in the warehouse area adjacent to and above the forklift battery charger where blanks were not installed in unused breaker locations and a knockout was missing on the side of the box.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided flammable and corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to, urethane hardener, wax and grease remover, acrylic urethane clear coat, primer, paint thinner, varnish, and automotive base coats for employee use in the preparation and finishing of furniture surfaces.  A written hazard communication program had not been developed to promote the safe handling and use of the hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area.   On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided flammable chemicals including, but not limited to, urethane hardener, wax and grease remover, acrylic urethane clear coat, primer, paint thinner, varnish, and automotive base coats for employee use in the preparation and finishing of furniture surfaces and employees were not provided with information and training on the specific hazards of the chemicals and their proper use, storage, and handling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.106 D03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Nov 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(3)(ii): Storage cabinets shall be designed and constructed to limit the internal temperature to not more than 325 deg. F. when subjected to a 10-minute fire test using the standard time-temperature curve as set forth in Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, NFPA 251-1969, which is incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6. All joints and seams shall remain tight and the door shall remain securely closed during the fire test. Cabinets were not labeled in conspicuous lettering, "Flammable - Keep Fire Away."  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provide a cabinet for use in the Mixing Room to store flammable liquids which was not  designed to limit internal temperature to 325 deg. F. during a 10 minute fire test and was not labeled in conspicuous lettering, "Flammable - Keep Fire Away."
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable extinguishers or hose used in lieu thereof under paragraph (d)(3) of this section were not visually inspected monthly.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided fire extinguishers for voluntary use in the workplace but did not visually inspect the extinguishers at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): The employer did not assure that portable fire extinguishers are subjected to an annual maintenance check.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provided fire extinguishers for voluntary use in the workplace but did not ensure that each fire extinguisher received an annual maintenance check.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2014
Abate by
Oct 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Where the employer has provided portable fire extinguishers for employee use in the workplace, the employer did not also provide an educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.  On or about September 03, 2014 the employer provide hand-held portable fire extinguishers for voluntary use throughout the workplace but did not provide information in the educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339931289.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.