Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: DAMIAN PONCE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAMIAN PONCE in 4925 PONT DU GARD DR., CUMMING, GA 30028 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339934614.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Damian Ponce for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Damian Ponce is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAMIAN PONCE
Site address
4925 PONT DU GARD DR.
City
CUMMING
State
GA
ZIP
30028
Mailing
1195 HILLARY LN, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2014
Abate by
Oct 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  On or about 09/04/14 located at 4925 Pont Du Gard Dr., Cumming, GA:  Employees were observed using a pneumatic nail gun without safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (S) $2200
  • · I (S) $1210
  • · Z (S) $2200

1926.405 A02 II I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,200
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables used for temporary wiring were not protected from damage:     On or about 09/04/14 located at 4925 Pont Du Gard Dr., GA: Employer failed to protect a flexible extension cord that ran across the street and was being damaged by vehicles along the length of the extension cord that employees were using.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (O) $2200
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2200

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2014
Abate by
Oct 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $6,160
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a)  NOTE TO CSHO: USE THIS OPTION ONLY IN CASES WHERE THE INFEASIBILITY/GREATER HAZARD EXCEPTION IS NOT IN ISSUE.   On or about 09/04/14 located at 4925 Pont Du Gard Dr., Cumming, GA:  Employees installing plywood on the 2nd floor while working from an unprotected floor were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10.7 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · A (R) $6160
  • · I (R) $3386
  • · Z (R) $6160

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339934614.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.