Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DALE & THOMAS POPCORN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DALE & THOMAS POPCORN in 1 CEDAR LN., ENGLEWOOD, NJ 07631 (NAICS 311340). OSHA activity number 339947053.

Watch Dale & Thomas Popcorn — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dale & Thomas Popcorn is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 CEDAR LN.
City
ENGLEWOOD
State
NJ
ZIP
07631
Mailing
1 CEDAR LN., ENGLEWOOD, NJ 07631
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311340
Employees
156
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $3375.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a) Production Area: Energy control (Lockout/Tagout) program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections was not developed at the workplace where Flavor mixing machines were used, and where employees were responsible for these machine cleaning, on or about 09/11/14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3375
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:  a) Facility: The company written hazard communication program did not have a list of the hazardous chemicals used at the workplace including Isopropanol (RTU Surface Sanitizer), on or about 09/11/14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(ii): The written hazard communication program did not include the methods the employer would use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks (for example, the cleaning of reactor vessels):  a) Facility: The written hazard communication program did not have the methods the employer would use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks including cleaning of the mixing machines, on or about 09/11/14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  a) Facility: Employees did not know about location of the company written hazard communication program at the workplace were employees worked with Isopropanol (RTU Surface Sanitizer), on or about 09/11/14.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339947053.