Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BPC REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BPC REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC in 7742 TYLER BOULEVARD, MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339957052.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BPC Realty Holdings, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BPC Realty Holdings, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7742 TYLER BOULEVARD
City
MENTOR
State
OH
ZIP
44060
Mailing
9049 TYLER BOULEVARD, MENTOR, OH 44060
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
36
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.      On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to protect employees performing roofing work, on a flat roof with a fall of approximately 25 feet to the lower level, with fall protection described in 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10).
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4900
  • · C (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.502 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Abate by
Dec 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1): Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area:    On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to install warning lines around all sides of the roof area.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.502 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level:    On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to provide a top rail that was 42 inches, plus or minus 3 inches, above the walking/working level for the railing leading to the debris chute.  The employer had installed a top rail that was 30 inches high.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $3000
  • · C (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high.    On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to provide a mid-rail or equivalent protection for the guardrails surrounding the debris chute.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.852 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.852(e): Chute openings, into which workmen dumped debris, were not protected by substantial guardrails approximately forty-two inches above the floor or other surface on which men stood to dump material:    On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to have a guardrail in front of the chute that is used to dump debris with the wheel barrow.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.852 F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.852(f):  A securely attached toeboard or bumper, not less than 4 inches thick and 6 inches high, was not provided at each chute opening where material was dumped from mechanical equipment or wheelbarrows.      On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to attach an adequate toeboard or bumper to the top of the chute which had debris dumped into it by wheelbarrows.  The employer was using a piece of wood that was 1.5 inches by 3.5 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 13 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.    On or about September 15, 2014, the employer failed to document in writing the training certification record for employees performing roofing work and who are exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339957052.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.