Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: RIEKER DULEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RIEKER DULEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 2356 W. HILLSBOROUGH AVE, TAMPA, FL 33603 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339972473.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rieker Duley Construction Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rieker Duley Construction Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2356 W. HILLSBOROUGH AVE
City
TAMPA
State
FL
ZIP
33603
Mailing
601 N. MAGNOLIA AVE SUITE 200, ORLANDO, FL 32801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02

Other-than-serious 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were using a supported scaffold that did not have base plates installed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 I

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were using a supported scaffold that did not have proper footings capable of supporting the loaded scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)     a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were using a supported scaffolding that was not fully planked on all working levels.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were working off a supported scaffolding with a working height greater than 10 feet without the use of personal fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Other-than-serious 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.     a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were using a supported scaffolding that was not erected on proper footing, missing base plates, not fully planked and the planks were not used in a manner to prevent them from displacing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:     a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were using a fabricated platform attached to the forklift to work on the sides of the building. The forklift manufacturer notice sticker in the cab of the forklift states the machine is not equipped to lift personnel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:     a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were  using an extension ladder to gain access to the upper landing surface. Ladder was not extended a minimum of 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.     a) For employees working at 2356 West Hillsborough Avenue in Tampa, as observed on or about September 23, 2014. Employees were installing plywood sheathing on the upper working surface. The edge to ground height measured approximately 23 feet 4 inches. The employees were not using fall protection or an alternative means of protection while installing the plywood sheathing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

View Rieker Duley Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339972473.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.