Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: PADEN FRAMING COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PADEN FRAMING COMPANY in 2617 KELLY LANE, PFLUGERVILLE, TX 78660 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339975401.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paden Framing Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paden Framing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2617 KELLY LANE
City
PFLUGERVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78660
Mailing
P.O. BOX 87, FLORENCE, TX 76527
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 6, 2014
Abate by
Oct 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:  On or about October 1, 2014, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffolding system used on site was designed by a qualified person, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 6, 2014
Abate by
Oct 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  On or about October 01, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employees were not trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with erecting pump scaffolding systems, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 6, 2014
Abate by
Oct 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):  Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:  On or about October 01, 2014, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold system installed on the west side of the property under construction had guardrails installed, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.452 J01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 6, 2014
Abate by
Oct 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(1): Pump jack brackets, braces, and accessories were not fabricated from metal plates and angles. Each pump jack bracket did not have two positive gripping mechanisms to prevent any failure or slippage.   On or about October 01, 2014, the scaffolding system installed on the west side of the property under construction was supported only by lumber, exposing employees to the hazards of falls in the event of scaffold failure or slippage.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 6, 2014
Abate by
Oct 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  On or about October 01, 2014, the pump jack scaffold system set up on the west side of the property under construction was supported by lumber instead of components approved by the manufacturer, exposing employees to the hazards of falls in the event of scaffold collapse or failure.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339975401.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.