WOLCOTT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MLG CONSTRUCTION LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MLG CONSTRUCTION LLC in 256 TODD ROAD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339977589.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MLG CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 256 TODD ROAD
- City
- WOLCOTT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06716
- Mailing
- 65 GARTHWAIT ROAD, WOLCOTT, CT 06716
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: Employees who were working below the eve of the roof that was being stripped were not protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees who were stripping asphalt shingles on the roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Jobsite: The ladder type material hoist that was used by employees to gain access to the roof was not designed to be used in such a manner.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339977589.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.