NORTH EASTON, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: ONEZIMO C. DE MELO
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of ONEZIMO C. DE MELO in 244 WASHINGTON STREET, NORTH EASTON, MA 02357 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339980112.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ONEZIMO C. DE MELO
- Site address
- 244 WASHINGTON STREET
- City
- NORTH EASTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02357
- Mailing
- 10 PLAUDETTE DRIVE #9, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: The Employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days, nor did they respond to the request letter sent by e-mail on 06/23/14.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Employees were standing on the top of wooden wall frames approximately 9 feet above the concrete floor below with no personal fall arrest system, safety net, or guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: Employees working from the top of wooden wall frames and from ladders were not provided training that would enable the employee to recognize fall hazards associated with them or how to reduce the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: (a) Jobsite, A stairway or ladder was not provided for personnel at points of access where there was a break in elevation of greater than 19 inches. The employees were accessing a point with an approximate 37 inch break in elevation. (b) Jobsite, A stairway or ladder was not provided for personnel at points of access where there was a break in elevation of greater than 19 inches. The employees were accessing a point with an approximate 48 inch break in elevation.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer did not certify or verify that employees were trained by preparing a written certification record.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339980112.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.