LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CANTU MASONRY
Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of CANTU MASONRY in 6506 CR 6410, LUBBOCK, TX 79423 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339981375.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CANTU MASONRY
- Site address
- 6506 CR 6410
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79423
- Mailing
- 2912 2ND STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79415
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Special Programs (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to head injury hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees wore hard hats while working on the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.403 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(e): Conductors were not spliced or joined with splicing devices designed for the use or by brazing, welding, or soldering with a fusible metal or alloy: On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical hazards in that the employer did not ensure an extension cord used for the brick saw was not spliced.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that the tubular welded frame scaffold poles were supported by base plates.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access: On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that a ladder was used to gain access to the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees were provide a guard rail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employee(s) laying bricks on a chimney on a 8 and 12 pitch roof above 6 feet were protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
RENO, NV—2026-07-16
DC MASONRY
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
LODI, NJ—2026-07-15
J & O MASONRY CONTRACTORS
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
LOMPOC, CA—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN EMPLOYER
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339981375.