Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CANTU MASONRY

Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of CANTU MASONRY in 6506 CR 6410, LUBBOCK, TX 79423 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339981375.

Watch Cantu Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cantu Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CANTU MASONRY
Site address
6506 CR 6410
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79423
Mailing
2912 2ND STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79415
Inspection type
Special Programs (K)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to head injury hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees wore hard hats while working on the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.403 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.403(e): Conductors were not spliced or joined with splicing devices designed for the use or by brazing, welding, or soldering with a fusible metal or alloy:    On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical hazards in that the employer did not ensure an extension cord used for the brick saw was not spliced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that the tubular welded frame scaffold poles were supported by base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access:  On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that a ladder was used to gain access to the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees were provide a guard rail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     On or about October 2, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employee(s) laying bricks on a chimney on a 8 and 12 pitch roof above 6 feet were protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339981375.