GREENVILLE, RI ·
OSHA Inspection: FAF INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FAF INC in 26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, GREENVILLE, RI 02828 (NAICS 423940). OSHA activity number 339981631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAF INC
- Site address
- 26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
- City
- GREENVILLE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02828
- Mailing
- 26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, GREENVILLE, RI 02828
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423940
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 C07
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(7): Electric lamps outside of but within 20 feet of spraying area(s), and not separated therefrom by partition(s), were not totally enclosed to prevent the falling of hot particles: a) Spray booth; On or about 10/2/14 an overhead light fixture adjacent to the spray booth was not totally enclosed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2250
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.107 F01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(1): Sprinkler heads were not located so as to provide water distribution throughout the entire booth. a) Spray booth; On or about 10/2/14 the sprinkler head above the spray booth was blocked by card board boxes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: a) Spray booth; On or about 10/2/14 the interior surfaces of the spray booth were heavily encrusted with combustible residues.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- May 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) Roof: On or about 10/2/14, a workplace hazard assessment had not been done and employees were routinely exposed to hazards including exposure to fall hazards when conducting HVAC equipment inspections on the roof of the buildings, Abatement Note: Once the PPE Hazard Assessment is completed you shall: 1) Certify that the hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132 (d)(2), 2) Provide training to affected employees in proper use of required PPE (1910.132 (f)(1)) Guidance on conducting and documenting a PPE Hazard Assessment can be found on OSHA's website at: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/personalprotectiveequipment/
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2250
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) Front Loading Dock: On or about 10/2/14 the employer had not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching and flushing of eyes and body where employees service powered industrial truck batteries containing sulfuric acid.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Throughout workplaces: On or about 10/2/14, the employer had not implemented a written hazard communication program to address chemical hazards in the workplace, including but not limited to acid battery solutions, spray paints and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2250
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: (a) Throughout workplaces: On or about 10/2/14, the employer did not ensure that material data safety sheets were readily accessible in the workplace, including but not limited to acid battery solutions, spray paints and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423940)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339981631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.