Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: FAF INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FAF INC in 26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, GREENVILLE, RI 02828 (NAICS 423940). OSHA activity number 339981631.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FAF INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FAF INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FAF INC
Site address
26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
City
GREENVILLE
State
RI
ZIP
02828
Mailing
26 LARK INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, GREENVILLE, RI 02828
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423940
Employees
150
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(7): Electric lamps outside of but within 20 feet of spraying area(s), and not separated therefrom by partition(s), were not totally enclosed to prevent the falling of hot particles:    a) Spray booth;  On or about 10/2/14 an overhead light fixture adjacent to the spray booth was not totally enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2250
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.107 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(1):  Sprinkler heads were not located so as to provide water distribution throughout the entire booth.  a) Spray booth;  On or about 10/2/14 the sprinkler head above the spray booth was blocked by card board boxes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  a) Spray booth;  On or about 10/2/14 the interior surfaces of the spray booth were heavily encrusted with combustible residues.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
May 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a) Roof:  On or about 10/2/14, a workplace hazard assessment had not been done and employees were routinely exposed to hazards including exposure to fall hazards when conducting HVAC equipment inspections on the roof of the buildings,    Abatement Note:   Once the PPE Hazard Assessment is completed you shall:      1) Certify that the hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification in accordance with 1910.132 (d)(2),     2) Provide training to affected employees in proper use of required PPE (1910.132 (f)(1))    Guidance on conducting and documenting a PPE Hazard Assessment can be found on OSHA's website at:     http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/personalprotectiveequipment/
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2250
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) Front Loading Dock:  On or about 10/2/14 the employer had not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching and flushing of eyes and body where employees service powered industrial truck batteries containing sulfuric acid.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 115 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Feb 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Throughout workplaces:  On or about 10/2/14, the employer had not implemented a written hazard communication program to address chemical hazards in the workplace, including but not limited to acid battery solutions, spray paints and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2250
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 115 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2014
Abate by
Feb 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  (a) Throughout workplaces:  On or about 10/2/14, the employer did not ensure that material data safety sheets were readily accessible in the workplace, including but not limited to acid battery solutions, spray paints and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339981631.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.