LEWIS CENTER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: RR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION in 6912 JENNIFER ANN DRIVE, LEWIS CENTER, OH 43035 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339982084.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 6912 JENNIFER ANN DRIVE
- City
- LEWIS CENTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43035
- Mailing
- 1393 LARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets. a) At the workplace, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employees that were working below employees working above their head wore protective head gear, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $640 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a) At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employees using a nail gun used eye protection when securing shingles on the roof, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $640
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. a) At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employees used fall protection when performing roofing work at heights greater than six feet, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 20 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1120
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 C
- Issued
- Oct 9, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $480 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): "Retraining." When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where: 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. a) At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees had a clear understanding on recognizing hazards such as, but not limited to falls and the requirements on knowing to use fall protection when working at heights greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $480
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339982084.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.