Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROADMASTER INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROADMASTER INDUSTRIES, INC. in 2504 MINNIS DRIVE, HALTOM CITY, TX 76117 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339982324.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roadmaster Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roadmaster Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2504 MINNIS DRIVE
City
HALTOM CITY
State
TX
ZIP
76117
Mailing
2504 MINNIS DRIVE, HALTOM CITY, TX 76117
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by and/or crushed-by hazards:     This violation occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the welding area, the pendant controls to the CM Lodestar 2-ton overhead hoist being used to move up to 2000 pound parts did not have legible function labels exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:    This violation occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the manufacturing facility, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear respirators to perform spraying operations with paints containing Isocyanates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    This violation occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the manufacturing facility, the employer did not provide medical evaluation for employees required to use respirators while spraying paints containing Isocyanates exposing employees to physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirators is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:     This violation occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the manufacturing facility, the employees required to use respirators were not fit tested prior to spraying paints containing Isocyanates or annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.                                                                                                               The violations occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the machine shop, employees working in the machine shop were not protected at the point of operation and at other locations where guards were not in place, used or over the rotating parts to protect the employees from being struck-by flying material, caught-in the rotating parts and amputation hazards:  a)  Employees operated a Delta drill press (model 17-600, serial # 1667314);    b)  Employees operated a Rockwell drill press (model 86-070 s/n not legible);    c) Employees operated a DoALL Band Saw (model C-916M, serial # 501-93325)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 14, 2015
Abate by
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910. 1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each work place, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning:       This violation occurred on October 01, 2014 and at times prior thereto, in the cleaning and spray booth areas, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was available at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Roadmaster Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339982324.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.