SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: MAXIM CONSTRUCTION GROUP, CORP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAXIM CONSTRUCTION GROUP, CORP in 230 174TH STREET, SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FL 33160 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 339982647.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAXIM CONSTRUCTION GROUP, CORP
- Site address
- 230 174TH STREET
- City
- SUNNY ISLES BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33160
- Mailing
- 1835 E. HALLENDALE BEACH BLVD #301, HALLANDALE BEACH, FL 33009
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees exposed to fall hazards: On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a 2 point suspension scaffold which had a parapet clamp connected to wire rope without a shackle or thimble. The scaffold measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while chipping concrete in a job site which did not have suspended scaffolds frequently and regularly inspected prior to the commencement of a work shift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.451 D05 III
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.451(d)(5)(iii): Tiebacks were not installed perpendicular to the face of the building or structure, nor were opposing angle tiebacks installed: a. On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width and did not have a parapet clamp restrained from movement. b. On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width and did not have tiebacks installed perpendicular at a right angle to the face of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.451 D12 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(12)(i): there were not a minimum of 3 wire clips installed with the clips a minimum of 6 rope diameters apart: On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width and the wire rope for the tiebacks only had 2 wire clips.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.451 D12 IV
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(12)(iv): Clips were not be inspected and retightened to the manufacturer's recommendations at the start of each workshift thereafter: On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width and did not have two (2) wire clips inspected and tightened with a torque wrench for a period of at least one (1) week.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G03 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffold, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion. On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width, and the lifeline was not protected from the sharp edge of a concrete building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.451 G03 IV
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes shall not be attached to each other, nor shall they be attached to or use the same point of anchorage, nor shall they be attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system: On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width with 2 lifelines connected to the same stairway.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
1926.454 B02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b)(2): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. On or about October 2, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were not trained by a competent person to recognize hazards associated with a two point suspension scaffold, and were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 200 feet from the 20th floor of a residential apartment complex under renovation while performing concrete chipping work from a two (2) point suspension scaffold which measured approximately 16 feet in length and 28 inches in width .
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $7000
More inspections at Maxim Construction Group, Corp
View Maxim Construction Group, Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339982647.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.