TOMAH, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: VALMETAL, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VALMETAL, INC. in 15497 STATE HWY 131, TOMAH, WI 54660 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339983322.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALMETAL, INC.
- Site address
- 15497 STATE HWY 131
- City
- TOMAH
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54660
- Mailing
- 15497 STATE HWY 131, TOMAH, WI 54660
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about September 30, 2014, the employer did not ensure employees wear a face shield and goggles while filling the forklift battery.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about September 30, 2014, there was no eyewash station present for employees filling the forklift battery.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) On or about 9/29/14, prior to requiring employees to operate the TCM FD60 forklift, the employer did not provide employees training to ensure each operator was competent. (b) On or about 9/29/14, prior to requiring employees to operate the Caterpillar forklift, the employer did not provide employees training to ensure each operator was competent. (c) On or about 10/01/14, prior to requiring employees to operate the Hyster 50 forklift, the employer did not provide employees training to ensure each operator was competent. (d) On or about 10/01/14, prior to requiring employees to operate the Hyster 45 forklift, the employer did not provide employees training to ensure each operator was competent. (e) On or about 10/01/14, prior to requiring employees to operate the HLF 25-5 forklift, the employer did not provide employees training to ensure each operator was competent.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1890
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Oct 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Powered industrial truck(s) which were used on a round-the-clock basis were not examined for defects after each shift: (a) On or about 9/29/14, prior to operating the TCM FD60 forklift, the employees did not do an inspection to ensure safe operation. (b) On or about 9/29/14, prior to operating the Caterpillar forklift, the employees did not do an inspection to ensure safe operation. (c) On or about 10/01/14, prior to operating the Hyster 50 forklift, the employees did not do an inspection to ensure safe operation. (d) On or about 10/01/14, prior to operating the Hyster 45 forklift, the employees did not do an inspection to ensure safe operation. (e) On or about 10/01/14, prior to operating the HLF 25-5 forklift, the employees did not do an inspection to ensure safe operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339983322.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.