Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCOIS CITGO- MONTICELLO

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FRANCOIS CITGO- MONTICELLO in 101 STATE HWY 69/39, MONTICELLO, WI 53570 (NAICS 447110). OSHA activity number 339987232.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Francois Citgo- Monticello — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Francois Citgo- Monticello is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
101 STATE HWY 69/39
City
MONTICELLO
State
WI
ZIP
53570
Mailing
101 STATE HWY 69/39, MONTICELLO, WI 53570
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
447110
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2015
Abate by
Jan 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:    The employer failed to provide abatement documentation for the following cited hazards:    a)  Employee training records for wearing personal protective equipment.    b)  Documents demonstrating the requirement to wear goggles.    c)  Documents that verify the eye wash was installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.132 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Nov 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(i): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use PPE on knowing when PPE is necessary:  On or about October 7, 2014, the employer did not provide training on when employees need to wear personal protective equipment such as goggles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Dec 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  On or about October 7, 2014, the employer did not require employees to wear goggles when using corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to: Swisher Low Temp Rinse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Dec 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  On or about October 7, 2014, the employer did not provide an eye wash to employees using corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to: Swisher Low Temp Rinse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2014
Abate by
Dec 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about October 7, 2014, the employer did not provide training to employees who corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to: Swisher Low Temp Rinse, the hazards of which include severe eye and skin irritation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339987232.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.