Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: MALDONADO CONTRACTING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MALDONADO CONTRACTING INC. in 999 SOUTH QUAKER LANE, WEST HARTFORD, CT 06110 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339988842.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Maldonado Contracting INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Maldonado Contracting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
999 SOUTH QUAKER LANE
City
WEST HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06110
Mailing
128 HECKEL STREET, BELLEVILLE, NJ 07109
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Abate by
Feb 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a)  Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT Job Site - The employer has not certified that Citation 1, Item 4 issued on 11/06/14 for training and certifying employees who operate rough terrain industrial lifts trucks was done by 11/26/14.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT. - On or about 10-7-14 - Employees were working on an eight on twelve pitch roof with a fall hazard of forty feet to the ground with no fall protection systems being used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B14

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system.  a)  Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT. - On or about 10-7-14 - Employees were lifting lumber through window and wall openings that were not protected with guardrail systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):  a) Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT. - On or about 10-7-14 - Employees were observed working at heights exceeding 6 feet to 40 feet in height using no fall protection.  Employees tied their rope life line system to the wooden truss system's two inch by four inch roof support beam with a knot and then tied their lanyard rope grabs to it.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l), as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.602(d):  a)  Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT. - On or about 10-07-14 - Employee operating a JLG 1044C-54 rough terrain lift was not trained and certified by the employer to operate the lift.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:  a)  Quaker Green Condos, West Hartford, CT. - On or about 10-7-14 - Employees were using a twelve foot aluminum extension ladder with defective and bent rungs to access their work area.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339988842.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.