Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PAI INDUSTRIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PAI INDUSTRIES, INC. in 950 NORTHBROOK PKWY, SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 339990459.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch PAI Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PAI Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
950 NORTHBROOK PKWY
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
950 NORTHBROOK PKWY, SUWANEE, GA 30024
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336390
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

23 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section 5(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards:  On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while performing work around damaged racks.  The employer failed to unload, replace or repair damaged racks.  The following racks were damaged: a.     Support leg at rack location 35 b.     Support leg at rack location 47    5(a)(1) Justification: 1. The employer failed to keep the workplace free from recognized hazards to which employees were exposed.  The company permitted a rack to continue to be used that had been damaged.  2. The hazard has been widely recognized.  ANSI MH16.1:2012 states that damaged racks shall be isolated by the user until the damaged portion is evaluated by a rack design professional. 3. The hazard is causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm from product falling from the rack or the rack itself falling.    AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THESE HAZARDS IS:  To follow American National Standard Institute (ANSI) MH16.1:2012, Specification for the Design, Testing, and Utilization of Industrial Storage Racks, Section 1.4.9, which states, "Upon any visible damage, the pertinent portions of the rack shall be immediately isolated by the user until the damaged portion is evaluated by a storage rack design professional.  Before allowing the rack to be placed back into service the design professional must certify that the rack system and/or the repaired components have been restored to at least their original design capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.23 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(1)(i): Rail, roller, picket fence, half door or equivalent barrier was not provided on the opening for handling materials, the guards were not kept in position regardless of a door on the opening.    On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards when the double doors used to place paper records in the records room in building 950 could be opened with the key available in the storage room.    There were no guardrails available once the doors were opened.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):     On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet when the opening used to place pallets of materials on the mezzanine was not protected by closing the gates.  A single chain with streamers had been placed across the opening.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.23 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): Flights of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with a standard railing as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section:    On or about October 16, 2014, employees were exposed to trip hazards when the exit steps outside building 950 were not equipped with handrails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.24 F

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.24(f): Rise height and tread width were not uniform throughout any flight of stairs including any foundation structure used as one or more treads of the stairs:    On or about October 16, 2014, employees were exposed to trip hazards when the risers were not the same height for the two steps that could be used to walk off the platform to the pine straw.  The concrete steps on the side of the platform did not have a handrail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to trip and smoke hazards when the steps outside of the emergency exit in building 950 had 2x4 boards nailed to the concrete.  The exit was not free and unobstructed due to the trip hazards caused by the boards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to eye injury when eye protection was not required when changing propane tanks on forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:     On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when the employer had not developed a lockout/tagout program or machine specific procedures to document how to lockout/tagout the equipment.  The employer has lathes, mills, saws, broaches, CNC machines, and other metal working machines that require maintenance.  Equipment such as, but not limited to, band saws and broaches require the use of lockout/tagout during machine setup or tool change.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the company had not included the EZ-GO stock chasers in the powered industrial truck training.  The only PIT included in the training were the forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5400

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the company did not consider the EZ-GO stock chasers to be powered industrial trucks.  No daily inspections were done on the EZ-GO stock chasers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible:    On or about October 1, 20214, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the doors on the Red Ring Gear Shaver machines that protected the employee from coolant spray and limited access to the cutting tool during operation were not secured and could be opened while the machines were running.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:     On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the tool rest was approximately 1/4 inch from the grinding wheel.  The grinder was located in the tool crib in building 2500.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:   On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the tongue guard was approximately 7/8 inches from the grinding wheel.  The grinder was located in the tool crib in building 2500.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Inside of buildings, cylinders were not stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 feet (6.1 m) from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior:  On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to fire hazards when a cylinder of oxygen was not secured to insure that it could not be knocked over and damaged.  It was stored next to the acetylene cylinders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to electrical and fire hazards when the employer was using a surge protector to provide electrical power for equipment for which it was not rated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:   On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards when the employer had not developed a program to address exposure for first responders and employees responsible for cleanup after an incident.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 F01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:   On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to bloodborne pathogen hazards when the employer had not offered Hep B vaccinations to first responders and employees responsible for cleanup after an incident.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about October 1, 2014, the training that the employees received was not effective in assuring that employees exposed to chemicals knew the location of the program or the location of the MSDS/SDS.  Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, aluminum, propane, coolant fluid, and machine oils.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.   On or about October 1, 2014, the employer had not posted the weight limit on the mezzanine in the warehouse.  The mezzanine is accessed daily by warehouse employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.37 B04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:   On or about October 1, 2014, employees were exposed to fire hazards when no exit was visible from the main aisle along the wall adjacent to the office area in building 950.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
May 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   On or about October 1, 2014, the employer had not implemented a noise monitoring program to determine if employees were exposed to noise levels that would require the establishment of a hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:   On or about October 1, 2014, the employer had not provided the information in Appendix D to employees that were voluntarily using dust masks while working around the part coolant on the production machines or when sanding a part.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 21, 2015
Abate by
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  On or about October 1, 2014, the employer failed to mount, label, or locate fire extinguishers in the following locations: a.     Fire extinguisher sign missing in building 950 near rack location 37. b.     Fire extinguisher on the floor (not mounted) in building 950 near the entrance to the area where parts are placed in cardboard boxes. c.     Fire extinguisher sign with no fire extinguisher in building 2500 inside rack. d.     Fire extinguisher on a desk (not mounted) in building 2500 near office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View PAI Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339990459.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.