Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AURA II, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AURA II, INC. in 8035 W. CALUMET RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53223 (NAICS 331492). OSHA activity number 339992281.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aura II, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aura II, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AURA II, INC.
Site address
8035 W. CALUMET RD.
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53223
Mailing
8035 W. CALUMET RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53223
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331492
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(c)(1): The employer did not develop a written plan of action regarding the implementation of the employee participation required by this paragraph.      In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:   (a) No written plan of action had been developed to assure employee participation in the development of process hazard analyses and in other elements of the process safety management program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(d): The employer did not complete a compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process.     In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:  (a) The employer had not developed a written compilation of process safety information on hazardous chemicals, technology, and equipment involved in the sulfur dioxide process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119:     In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:      (a) A process hazard analysis of the sulfur dioxide process had not been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information:     In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:    (a)     Written operating procedures had not been developed for the sulfur dioxide process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(ii): In lieu of initial training for those employees already involved in operating a process on May 26, 1992, the employer did not certify in writing that the employee had the required knowledge, skills, and ability to safely carry out the duties and responsibilities as specified in the operating procedures.     In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:    (a) The employer had not certified in writing that the Chemical Technician in the Acid Room, who has been operating the sulfur dioxide process since prior to May 26. 1992, had the required knowledge, skills, and ability to safely carry out the duties and responsibilities as specified in the operating procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:      In and adjacent to the Acid Room, the quantity of sulfur dioxide exceeded the threshold quantity listed in Appendix A:    (a)  No written procedures had been established and implemented to maintain the mechanical integrity of the sulfur dioxide system including storage tanks, hose connectors, pumps, motors, piping systems, and associated valves in and adjacent to the Acid Room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 07901430144018601903

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or for required respirator use:     (a) No written respiratory protection program had been established for respirator use.   Hazardous chemicals used and present in this facility included nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide.  Escape respirators were present in the workplace for emergency use.     (b) No worksite-specific procedures, in accordance with section (d) of this standard, were developed for respirator filter cartridge change-out schedule.     (c) Medical evaluation procedures, in accordance with section (e) of this standard, were not implemented to assure that all respirator users were physically able to use the full face respirator.     (d) Site-specific procedures were not established for emergency escape respirators, in accordance with section (h) of this standard, to assure that these emergency respirators were maintained ready for use and that defective respirators were either repaired or discarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a)  The plant manager used a full face respirator equipped with combination cartridges when performing tasks in the Acid Room and had not been provided a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 28, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 143018602290

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:  (a) No change schedule had been developed and implemented for half-face and full-face respirators, used by workers performing work operations in the Acid Lab, to assure that the acid gas cartridges on these respirators were changed before the end of their service life.  Chemicals used in the Acid Lab included Sulfur Dioxide, Nitric Acid, and Hydrogen Chloride.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1440

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(4): Respirators that failed an inspection or were otherwise found to be defective were not removed from service and discarded or repaired:  (a) On or around December 12, 2014, in the Cyanide Area, two emergency use respirators, which had been labeled "Condemned", were still present in the work place and had not been discarded or repaired.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2015
Abate by
Apr 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2290

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:    a) Inadequate hazard communication training had been provided regarding appropriate work practices regarding safe storage of sulfur dioxide compressed gas cylinders; in that, workers stored sulfur dioxide cylinders together with combustible materials, such as propane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Aura II, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339992281.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.