EL PASO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MAGIC STONE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAGIC STONE in 6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79915 (NAICS 541410). OSHA activity number 340001213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAGIC STONE
- Site address
- 6821 MARKET AVE
- City
- EL PASO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79915
- Mailing
- 6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541410
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and floor opening was not adequately guarded by standard railing or any other effected means. On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employees were working near a floor opening that was not covered. This condition exposed employee to trip and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling. On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, type NM cable was used to energize the light fixture in the break room was not installed in accordance with listing and labeling instructions. Employees were exposed to electrical hock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 C04
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Faceplates for flush-mounted snap switches. Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface: On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, the snap switch box for the light fixture in the break room did not have a cover, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 J03 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(3)(i): Appliances had live parts normally exposed to employee contact. On October 09, 2014 and times prior, employees were using a water fountain located in the entrance of the maintenance shop that was missing the front cover and exposing live parts. This condition exposed employees to electrical shock hazards
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employers did not develop nor implement a respiratory protection program to employees working in fabrication shop. This condition exposed employees to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.134 C01 II
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii): The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators. On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement a respiratory protection program with provisions for medical evaluations of employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 III
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(iii): The written program did not contain fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators. On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement a respiratory protection program including procedures for tight-fitting respirators to employees working in fabrication department.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee(s) was exposed to Crystalline Silica as reparable quartz in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of 10 mg/m3 e/ /% SiO2+2 listed in Table Z-3: In the grinding area, an employee performing grinding was exposed to respirable dust containing 4.9% crystalline quartz at an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exceeding 10 milligram per cubic meter. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable dust containing 4.9% crystalline quartz is 1.45 milligrams per cubic meter. The employees exposure was 3 times the PEL. Sampling was conducted for 2.69 minutes on October 15, 2014. Zero exposure as assumed for the remaining 211 minutes
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, the employer did not provide administrative or engineering controls to minimize employee exposure to the different types of silica they worked with. This condition exposed employees to adverse health hazards associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement hazard communication program. This conditions exposed employees to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. On October 19, 2014, and times prior to, the break room was not kept clean and in an orderly or sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service. On October 09, 2014 and times prior to. employees were using a powered industrial truck that was not examined before service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $400
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered. On October 09, 2014 and times prior to, employees were using a powered industrial truck with a front end attachment. The data plate was not marked to identify its capacity using the attachment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Magic Stone
View Magic Stone's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541410)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340001213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.