Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAGIC STONE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAGIC STONE in 6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79915 (NAICS 541410). OSHA activity number 340001213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Magic Stone — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Magic Stone is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAGIC STONE
Site address
6821 MARKET AVE
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79915
Mailing
6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79915
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541410
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and floor opening was not adequately guarded by standard railing or any other effected means.     On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employees were working near a floor opening that was not covered.  This condition exposed employee to trip and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, type NM cable was used to energize the light fixture in the break room was not installed in accordance with listing and labeling instructions. Employees were exposed to electrical hock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Dec 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4): Faceplates for flush-mounted snap switches. Snap switches mounted in boxes did not have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface:    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, the snap switch box for the light fixture in the break room did not have a cover, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 J03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(3)(i): Appliances had live parts normally exposed to employee contact.    On October 09, 2014 and times prior, employees were using a water fountain located in the entrance of the maintenance shop that was missing the front cover and exposing live parts.  This condition exposed employees to electrical shock hazards
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employers did not develop nor implement a respiratory protection program to employees working in fabrication shop. This condition exposed employees to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.134 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii): The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators.    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement a respiratory protection program with provisions for medical evaluations of employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(iii): The written program did not contain fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators.    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement a respiratory protection program including procedures for tight-fitting respirators to employees working in fabrication department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee(s) was exposed to Crystalline Silica as reparable quartz in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of 10 mg/m3 e/ /% SiO2+2 listed in Table Z-3:     In the grinding area, an employee performing grinding was exposed to respirable dust containing 4.9% crystalline quartz at an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exceeding 10 milligram per cubic meter. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable dust containing 4.9% crystalline quartz is 1.45 milligrams per cubic meter.  The employees exposure was 3 times the PEL. Sampling was conducted for 2.69 minutes on October 15, 2014. Zero exposure as assumed for the remaining 211 minutes
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):    On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, the employer did not provide administrative or engineering controls to minimize employee exposure to the different types of silica they worked with. This condition exposed employees to adverse health hazards associated with silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.   On October 09, 2014, and times prior to, employer did not develop or implement hazard communication program. This conditions exposed employees to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.22 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    On October 19, 2014, and times prior to, the break room was not kept clean and in an orderly or sanitary condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Dec 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service.  On October 09, 2014 and times prior to. employees were using a powered industrial truck that was not examined before service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2014
Abate by
Jan 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered.    On October 09, 2014 and times prior to, employees were using a powered industrial truck with a front end attachment. The data plate was not marked to identify its capacity using the attachment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Magic Stone's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340001213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.