Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BIMBO BAKERIES USA- HOUSTON

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BIMBO BAKERIES USA- HOUSTON in 6650 N HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD, HOUSTON, TX 77091 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 340008036.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bimbo Bakeries USA- Houston — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bimbo Bakeries USA- Houston is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6650 N HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77091
Mailing
6650 N HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD, HOUSTON, TX 77091
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
165
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2014
Abate by
Nov 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.   The employer does not ensure that energy control procedures specifically outline the steps for shutting down or isolating equipment to control hazardous energy.  This violation occurred on or about October 15, 2014, at the pan-o-mat #2 where production employees were exposed to caught-in and struck-by hazards when performing change-over and cleaning without specifically outlining the steps for isolating the pneumatic energy to the equipment.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that energy control procedures specifically outline the steps for shutting down or isolating equipment to control hazardous energy.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2014
Abate by
Nov 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):   The employer does not ensure that all energy isolating devices are operated in a manner as to isolate the machine from the energy source.      a) This violation occurred on or about September 26, 2014, at the pan-o-mat #2 where a production employee was exposed to caught-in hazards when cleaning the dough off the chutes without de-energizing all the electric and pneumatic energy sources.     b) This violation occurred on or about October 15, 2014, at the pan-o-mat #2 where a production employee was exposed to caught-in hazards when performing change-over and cleaning without de-energizing the pneumatic energy source.        Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that all energy isolating devices are operated in a manner as to isolate the machine from the energy source.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2014
Abate by
Nov 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:   The employer does not ensure that training is provided to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program is understood by employees.  This violation occurred on or about October 15, 2014, at the facility where production employees were exposed to caught-in and struck-by hazards when performing change-overs and cleaning on equipment such as, but not pan-o-mat #2 without training on the energy control program.       Pursuant to 29 C.F. R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that training is provided so that the purpose and function of the energy control program is understood by employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340008036.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.