Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GIO'S REMODELING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GIO'S REMODELING, LLC in 30 EAST LIBERTY ST., WATERBURY, CT 06702 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340008234.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gio'S Remodeling, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gio'S Remodeling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30 EAST LIBERTY ST.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06702
Mailing
36 SHEFFIELD ST., WATERBURY, CT 06704
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm)  Worksite: The single metal scaffold platform from that an employee was working was not installed so that each end extended at least six inches beyond its supports centerline.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    Worksite: The employee, who was working from the single scaffold platform was not provided with appropriate means of access and using the ladder that was supporting the platform to access the platform.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed.  Worksite: An 8-foot stepladder was not used for the purpose in which it was designed.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Dec 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Worksite: The single metal scaffold platform from that an employee was working at a height above 10 feet was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Dec 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Worksite: The employee who was working from the single metal scaffold platform at a height above 10 feet was not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Dec 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employee who was exposed to fall hazards of over six feet while working from a porch overhang was not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Worksite: The employee who was working from the single metal scaffold platform at a height above 10 feet was not protected  from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2014
Abate by
Nov 26, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: The employee, who was working from the 2 in 12 pitch roof/overhang was not protected from the hazard of falling 11 feet to the ground by any type of fall protection systems/devices. Further, the employee was using the roof to gain access to the scaffold platform.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340008234.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.