AMARILLO, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: RENEE VASQUEZ
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of RENEE VASQUEZ in #4 PINECREST, AMARILLO, TX 79124 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340008390.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RENEE VASQUEZ
- Site address
- #4 PINECREST
- City
- AMARILLO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79124
- Mailing
- 1326 CAROLYN, AMARILLO, TX 79107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about October 14, 2104, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not insure use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer did not ensure use of safety glasses by employees cutting bricks during brick laying operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platforms: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the scaffolding was fully decked.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that the space in between planks was no more than one inch.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: On or about October 14, 2014 employees were exposed to caught in and struck by hazards in that the employer did not properly erect the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 B03
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling. On or about October 14, 2014 employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of ten feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 IV
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(iv): Each employee on a self-contained adjustable scaffold shall be protected by a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) when the platform is supported by the frame structure, and by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to provide a guard rail system on the scaffolding structure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 10 feet in that the employer failed to ensure that guardrail systems were in place to keep employees from falling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 B10
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(10): Scaffold components manufactured by different manufacturers were modified in order to intermix them and a competent person did not determine that the resulting scaffold was structurally sound: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to caught in hazards in that the employer did not ensure that the same manufactured scaffold was used throughout the assembly and erection of scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall and caught in hazards in that the employer failed to inspect the scaffold before each work shift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to caught in and fall hazards in that the employer failed to use base plates and mud sills for the erected scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02 III
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iii): Unstable objects were used as working platforms: On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards and caught in hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that employees were working from a stable platform.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to fall hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that employees had a ladder or other means of access to ascend and descend the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall. On or about October 14, 2014, employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340008390.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.