Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BASF CORP.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BASF CORP. in 120 PINE ST., ELYRIA, OH 44035 (NAICS 325180). OSHA activity number 340011550.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Basf Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Basf Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BASF CORP.
Site address
120 PINE ST.
City
ELYRIA
State
OH
ZIP
44035
Mailing
120 PINE ST., ELYRIA, OH 44035
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325180
Employees
170
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 4, 2015
Abate by
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,805 · Current $1,964 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by and crush hazards from crane/hoist operations, in that control pendants had not been marked as to the intended use of each button:  a) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to ensure that pendant control box of the Harrington under-hung crane located at Line #3 BBU 1131 within the powder room was clearly labeled for the purpose of directional functions. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the event of pressing the wrong directional button.     b) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to ensure that pendant control box of the Harrington under-hung crane located at Line #3 BBU 1132 within the powder room was clearly labeled for the purpose of directional functions. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the event of pressing the wrong directional button.     c) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to ensure that pendant control box of the Harrington under-hung crane located at Line #3 BBU 1133 within the powder room was clearly labeled for the purpose of directional functions. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the event of pressing the wrong directional button.     d) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to ensure that pendant control box of the Harrington under-hung crane located at Line #2 BBU 1121 within the powder room was clearly labeled for the purpose of directional functions. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the event of pressing the wrong directional button.     e) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to ensure that pendant control box of the Harrington under-hung crane located at Line #2 BBU 1122 within the powder room was clearly labeled for the purpose of directional functions. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the event of pressing the wrong directional button.   Among other methods, feasible and acceptable methods to correct the hazardous condition may include: Following the requirements The American Society of Mechanical Engineers safety standard for cableways, cranes, derricks, hoists, hooks, jacks, and slings, ASME B30.16, chapter 16, section 16-1.1.2, and ensuring that pendant controls are clearly marked as to the purpose of the directional buttons.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1963.5
  • — Z (S) $2805

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 4, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,805 · Current $1,964 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  a) On or about November 13, 2014 the employer failed to provide employees with appropriate personal protection equipment. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with falls of approximately six feet in that employees stand on the mid rail of a rolling stair case to check the inside of Vac-U-Max hoppers for powder accumulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1963.5
  • — Z (S) $2805

View Basf Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340011550.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.