Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VERE INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VERE INC. in 3 SCHREIBER INDUSTRIAL PARK, NEW KENSINGTON, PA 15068 (NAICS 339111). OSHA activity number 340013697.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vere INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vere INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VERE INC.
Site address
3 SCHREIBER INDUSTRIAL PARK
City
NEW KENSINGTON
State
PA
ZIP
15068
Mailing
3 SCHREIBER INDUSTRIAL PARK, NEW KENSINGTON, PA 15068
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339111
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1):   The employer did not ensure that the spray booth was substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry except that aluminum or other substantial noncombustible material may be used for intermittent or low volume spraying:    a)  In the Spray Booth Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that the spray booth was constructed of steel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.107 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2):   The employer did not ensure that the interior surfaces of spray booths were smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury.   a)  In the Spray Booth Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that the interior surfaces of the spray booth were smooth and continuous.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B10

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10):   The employer did not ensure that panels shall effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit is located, and shall be of a noncombustible material of such a nature or so protected that breakage will be unlikely:    a)  In the Spray Booth Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that the lighting fixtures in the spray booth were protected from breakage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9):  The employer did not ensure that a clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides shall be kept free from storage or combustible construction:      a)  In the Spray Booth Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that a clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides of the spray booth was kept free from storage including but not limited to the storage of flammables in the spray booth and cardboard stored on top of the booth.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a)  Wash Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not provide an adequate eyewash station in an area where a corrosive material is used.  The eyewash station needs to provide a minimum of 15 minutes of flushing fluid at .4 GPM at 30 psi.  Employees use Betco Spray Foam, Foaming Degreaser to clean oil from steel and this is product is a "corrosive material."
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $780
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.107 G07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 18, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7):  The employer did not ensure that "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms:  a)  In the Spray Booth Area, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not ensure that "No Smoking" signs were posted in the area of the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:     a)  In the Facility, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when the employer required the use of respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a)  In the Facility, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to employees when the employer required the use of respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a)  In the Facility, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not provide a fit test to employees when the employer required the use of tight-fitting respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 7, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer did not provide respirator training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace.   a)  In the Facility, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not provide respirator training to employees when the employer required the use of respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Jan 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The employer did not provide training on the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a)  In the Facility, on or about October 17, 2014 - The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on the new label elements and safety data sheet format as required by the revised hazard communication standard of 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Vere INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340013697.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.