Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCOIS & COMPANY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FRANCOIS & COMPANY, LLC in 1990 DEFOORS AVENUE NW, ATLANTA, GA 30318 (NAICS 339999). OSHA activity number 340019223.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Francois & Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Francois & Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1990 DEFOORS AVENUE NW
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30318
Mailing
1990 DEFOORS AVENUE NW, ATLANTA, GA 30318
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339999
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):  a)  Loading Dock Area - The platform at the loading docks was measured to be at a height of 51 inches from the surface of the ground to the edge of the dock platform and was not guarded, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    a)  Finishing Area - Employees in the finishing area voluntarily used a tight fitting 3M brand half-face respirator and the employer did not ensure the employee was medically able to do so.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    a) Wood Working Area - The handfed table saw located at the front of the woodworking area of the shop had no hood guard exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:    a) Wood Working Area - The handfed table saw located at the front of the woodworking area of the shop had no spreader to prevent the material from squeezing the blade or being thrown back on the operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:  a) Wood Working Area - The handfed table saw located at the front of the woodworking area of the shop had no kick-back dogs to prevent the material from being thrown back on the operator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(g)(1): Swing cutoff saw(s) were not provided with an automatically adjusting hood that completely enclosed the upper half of the saw, the arbor end, and the point of operation at all positions of the saw:    a) Near Loading Dock - The cut-off saw, used to construct custom pallets, had its blade guard locked in an upright position, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a) Finishing Area - The compressed air used for cleaning debris off products during the finishing stage was not reduced to 30 psi at the nozzle exit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Feb 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  a)  The Loading Area - Employees were required to operate a forklift and the employer did not provide training to the employees on the forklift's safe operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Jan 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was connected that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a)  The Finishing Room - Two flexible cords located in the finishing room were used to power portable sanders.  The strain relief was broken,  allowing any pulling on the cord to be transmitted directly to the conductors and joints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)  The Finishing Area - Employees are required to sand and buff materials such as, but not limited to, scagliola and pewter and have not been trained on the hazards of these materials or how to control their exposure to these chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Francois & Company, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340019223.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.