Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANCHOR MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANCHOR MASONRY in 3878 MCDONALD AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63116 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 340019751.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Anchor Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Anchor Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANCHOR MASONRY
Site address
3878 MCDONALD AVENUE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63116
Mailing
204 LAUREL WOOD DRIVE, SAINT PETERS, MO 63376
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  At the job site, the employer did not instruct his exposed employees in recognizing the following hazards:  a/  Silica dust generated during tuckpointing work.  b/  That flexible, extension cords used to power portable hand grinders were not protected from damage.  c/  Flexible, extension cords used to power portable hand grinders were not designed for hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1):  The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training did not include the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area:  At the job site, exposed employees working from ladder jack scaffolds were not instructed to recognize the following hazards:  a/  The safe working distance from an overhead power line.  b/  Safe access to and egress from the working platform.  c/  When a personal fall arrest system was required.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables were not be protected from damage. Sharp corners, pinch points, and projections were not avoided:  a/  At the job site, the orange and flexible cords supplying 120 volt electrical power to two Bosh Portable Hand Grinders, m/n AG40-85, unknown s/n, were pinched by the front door of the home where the tuckpointing work was been performed.  No protective device was in place to protect both flexible cords.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.405 A02 II J

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not of three-wire type and not designed for hard or extra-hard usage:  a/  At the job site, both the orange and yellow flexible cords used to power Bosch Portable Hand Grinders, m/n AG40-85, unknown s/n, were not designed for hard or extra hard usage.  Both flexible cords were 14 guage when they should have been a minimum of ten gauge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):  When scaffold platforms were more than two (2) feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used:  a/  At the job site, unsafe access to and egress from a ladder jack scaffold were not provided.  The brackets supporting the work platform belonging to this scaffold were facing outwards from the exterior wall necessitating the exposed employee to climb over the one facing north.  The fall distance from the working platform to the ground below was approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6):  Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they or any conductive material handled on them might come closer to exposed and energized power lines:  a/  At the job site, the south end of a ladder jack scaffold was approximately one foot away from a live, overhead power line (OHPL) that was supplying 220/120 volt electrical power to the home.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2014
Abate by
Dec 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i):    Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  a/  At the job site, employee(s) working from a platform supported by a ladder jack scaffold was not provided with or using a personal fall arrest system.  The fall distance was approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Anchor Masonry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340019751.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.