DAYTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: LEWARK METAL SPINNING, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEWARK METAL SPINNING, INC. in 2746 KEENAN AVENUE, DAYTON, OH 45414 (NAICS 332117). OSHA activity number 340023464.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEWARK METAL SPINNING, INC.
- Site address
- 2746 KEENAN AVENUE
- City
- DAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45414
- Mailing
- 2746 KEENAN AVENUE, DAYTON, OH 45414
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332117
- Employees
- 38
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): a) The employer did not evaluate employee exposure to hexavalent chromium when employees are, welding, polishing and deburring stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: A) A hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented for employees working with chemicals such as rust inhibitors, lubricants and coolants.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) The employer did not train employees who work with chemicals such as but not limited to, rust inhibitors and coolants (skin/eye irritants, flammable) on the hazards of the chemicals prior to working with them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) There was an plastic spray bottle located at the leblond lathe 220 that contained Chimcool (eye and skin irritant) that did not have the identity of the chemical marked on the bottle.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings. a) There were many plastic spray bottles around the facility containing rush inhibitor (JAO-6, flammable), cimcool (eye/skin irritant) and other chemicals that did not have any hazard warnings on them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: A) A written certification of a hazard assessment had not been performed by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Lewark Metal Spinning, INC.
View Lewark Metal Spinning, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332117)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340023464.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.