Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCO ROOFING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANCO ROOFING, INC. in 58 EDGEMONT RD., KATONAH, NY 10536 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340025444.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Franco Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Franco Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
58 EDGEMONT RD.
City
KATONAH
State
NY
ZIP
10536
Mailing
159 RAMSEY AVENUE, YONKERS, NY 10701
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,760 · Current $1,628 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/2014    a) Employees engaged in residential roofing activities, were exposed to hazards including but not limited to, lack of personal protective equipment. The employees were not provided with adequate general safety and health training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1628
  • — Z (S) $1760

1926.451 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide:    location: roof  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees were engaged in roofing work from roof mounted bracket scaffolds. The platform was only 9 1/2 inches wide.     location: northwest exterior corner of house  on or about: 10/20/14    b) An employee was engaged in roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold. The platform was only 9 1/2 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:      location:  exterior of house and on roof  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees engaged in residential roofing work were working from roof mounted bracket scaffolding and a ladder jack scaffold. The scaffolds were not inspected for safety by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2200

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:  location:  exterior of house and on roof on or about: 10/20/14  a) Employees engaged in residential roofing work, erected and worked from roof mounted bracket scaffolding and a ladder jack scaffold. The scaffolds were not erected under the supervision or direction of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:      location: entire site  on or about: 10/17/14    a) Employees engaged in residential roofing work, erected roof mounted bracket scaffolding. The employees were not provided with scaffold erection safety training.    location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/14    b) An employee, engaged in residential roofing work, erected a ladder jack scaffold. The employee was not provided with scaffold erection safety training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.100 A

Repeat Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,520 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/2014    a) Employees were working on roof bracket scaffolds, ladders, a ladder jack scaffold and on the ground. The employees who were not provided with had hats, were exposed to overhead falling object hazards, such as roofing materials and equipment.      The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.100(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $3520

1926.451 G01

Repeat Gravity 10 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,160 · Current $3,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level:    location: roof  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees engaged in roofing work from roof mounted bracket scaffolds were not protected from falling up to 16 feet to the ground below.    location: northwest exterior corner of house  on or about: 10/20/14    b) An employee engaged in roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold was not protected from falling up to 13 feet 4 inches to the ground below.      The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314977844, citation number 1, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on 12/29/2011, with respect to a workplace located at 630 Palisade Ave., Yonkers, NY 10703.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3600
  • — Z (R) $6160

1926.454 A

Repeat Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:      location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees engaged in residential roofing work, were working from roof mounted bracket scaffolding and a ladder jack scaffold. The employees were not provided with adequate scaffold safety training.    location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/14    b) An employee engaged in residential roofing work was working from roof mounted bracket scaffolding. The employee was not provided with adequate scaffold safety training.    The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.454(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8000
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:    location: roof  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not protected from falling up to 23 1/2 feet, to the ground below.      The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 2, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8000
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not provided with adequate fall protection training. The employees were exposed to a fall of  up to 23 1/2 feet.      location: entire site  on or about: 10/20/14    b) An employee engaged in residential roofing was not provided with fall protection training. The employees were exposed to a fall of  up to 23 1/2 feet.        The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited repeat for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 2, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $8000
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.1053 B05 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):      location: north side of house  on or about: 10/20/14    a) An employee was using a metal extension ladder to access and work on the roof. The horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder (14.8 ft.) was much greater than one quarter of the working length of the ladder (4.7 ft.).        The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 1, item number 5a and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3000
  • — Z (R) $4400

1926.1060 A

Repeat Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:      location: entire site   on or about: 10/20/14    a) Employees were using metal extension ladders to access upper levels and to perform roofing activities. The employees were not provided with adequate ladder safety training.    location: entire site   on or about: 10/20/14    a) An employee was using metal extension ladders to access upper levels and to perform roofing activities. The employee was not provided with ladder safety training.    The employer, Franco Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.1060(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 279187, citation number 1, item number 5b and was affirmed as a final order on 8/17/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 357 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich, Ct 06831.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $3000
  • — Z (R) $4400

View Franco Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340025444.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.