BAY MINETTE, AL —
OSHA Inspection: BALDWIN TRANSFER CO., INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BALDWIN TRANSFER CO., INC. in 2410 HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340027192.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BALDWIN TRANSFER CO., INC.
- Site address
- 2410 HWY 31
- City
- BAY MINETTE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36507
- Mailing
- 2410 HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493110
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards in that seatbelt use while operating forklifts is not enforced: (a) In the warehouse: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to enforce the use of seat belts while operating forklifts such as, but not limited to the YALE and CAT forklifts, exposing the employee to a potential crushing hazard in the event of a tip or rollover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.37 E
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(e): The employer did not assure that fire alarm signaling systems were maintained and tested in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.165(d): (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer exposed the employees to fire hazards such as, but not limited to burns and smoke and fume inhalation in that the employer did not develop or maintain an alarm signaling system to notify employees of a hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a Powered Industrial Truck (PIT). (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer exposed employees working in the warehouse to struck-by and crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees were trained in accordance with 1910.178 (l).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: (a) In the warehouse: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that the horn was not operating on forklift BT 708. (b) In the warehouse: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that the horn was not operating on forklift NISSAN 722. (C) In the warehouse: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that large portions of both front tires were broken off creating an unstable load.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to implement a written hazard communication program, exposing employees to chemical hazards such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to maintain in the workplace copies of required safety data sheets such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid exposing the employees to hazards associated with each.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to conduct hazard communication training that addressed the hazards of chemicals in the workplace such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition: (a) Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to the employer exposed employees to slip hazards from oil on floors located throughout the warehouse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Dec 30, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: (a) The power supply for the warehouse located on the North wall: On October 22l, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to effectively close un-used openings in junction boxes, exposing employees to potential arc flash hazards while entering the restroom that was located approximately 12 feet away.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Baldwin Transfer CO., INC.
View Baldwin Transfer CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493110)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340027192.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.