Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BALDWIN TRANSFER CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BALDWIN TRANSFER CO., INC. in 2410 HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340027192.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baldwin Transfer CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baldwin Transfer CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2410 HWY 31
City
BAY MINETTE
State
AL
ZIP
36507
Mailing
2410 HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
150
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards in that seatbelt use while operating forklifts is not enforced:  (a)  In the warehouse:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to enforce the use of seat belts while operating forklifts such as, but not limited to the YALE and CAT forklifts, exposing the employee to a potential crushing hazard in the event of a tip or rollover.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3200
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.37 E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 150 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(e): The employer did not assure that fire alarm signaling systems were maintained and tested in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.165(d):  (a)  Facility Wide: On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer exposed the employees to fire hazards such as, but not limited to burns and smoke and fume inhalation in that the employer did not develop or maintain an alarm signaling system to notify employees of a hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3200
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a Powered Industrial Truck (PIT).  (a)  Facility Wide:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer exposed employees working in the warehouse to struck-by and crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure that employees were trained in accordance with 1910.178 (l).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3200
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  (a)  In the warehouse:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that the horn was not operating on forklift BT 708.  (b)  In the warehouse:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that the horn was not operating on forklift NISSAN 722.  (C)  In the warehouse:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to examine forklifts exposing warehouse employees to struck-by hazards in that large portions of both front tires were broken off creating an unstable load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a)  Facility Wide:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to implement a written hazard communication program, exposing employees to chemical hazards such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a)  Facility Wide:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to maintain in the workplace copies of required safety data sheets such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid exposing the employees to hazards associated with each.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a)  Facility Wide:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to conduct hazard communication training that addressed the hazards of chemicals in the workplace such as, but not limited to propane and hydraulic fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.22 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition:  (a)  Facility Wide:  On October 22, 2014 and at times prior to the employer exposed employees to slip hazards from oil on floors located throughout the warehouse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2014
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:  (a)  The power supply for the warehouse located on the North wall: On October 22l, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to effectively close un-used openings in junction boxes, exposing employees to potential arc flash hazards  while entering the restroom that was located approximately 12 feet away.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Baldwin Transfer CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340027192.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.