WATERFORD, NY —
OSHA Inspection: PURE PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PURE PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC. in 56 HUDSON RIVER ROAD, WATERFORD, NY 12188 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 340028323.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PURE PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 56 HUDSON RIVER ROAD
- City
- WATERFORD
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12188
- Mailing
- 56 HUDSON RIVER ROAD, WATERFORD, NY 12188
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336390
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) Machine Shop - On or about October 22, 2014, for the employees that use machinery, including but not limited to, the three Haas Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines, lathes, a mill, and a hydraulic press. The employer did not establish an overall program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections which was needed to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on these machines or other machines in the shop that the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy would not occur and cause injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle: a) On or about October 22, 2014 an employee was operating a Enco Vertical Manual Mill in a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 which was not guarded at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a) On or about October 22, 2014 the employer was operating a Enco Vertical Manual Mill in a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 and did not have it securely anchored to prevent walking or moving. b) On or about October 22, 2014 the employer was operating a Arcan Model P50 Hydraulic Press in a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 and did not have it securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.303 B07 III
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iii): Internal parts of electrical equipment, including busbars, wiring terminals, insulators, and other surfaces, may not be damaged or contaminated by foreign materials such as paint, plaster, cleaners, abrasives, or corrosive residues: a) Machine Shop - On or about October 22, 2014 an energized ENCO 038-0232 lathe had a damaged flexible cord near the plug.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about October 22, 2014 an employee was operating a Enco ENCO111-1445 lathe serial number 060641 in a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 without adequate guarding to protect the employee from rotating parts and the point of operation. b) On or about October 22, 2014 an employee was operating a Enco ENCO111-1445 lathe serial number 991503 machinery in a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 without adequate guarding to protect the employee from rotating parts and the point of operation. c) On or about October 22, 2014 a ENCO 308-0232 lathe no serial number was reported to be periodically in use at a machine shop at 56 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188 without adequate guarding to protect the employee from rotating parts and the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Pure Performance Group, INC.
View Pure Performance Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336390)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340028323.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.