Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: ROGERS INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROGERS INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC. in 532 S. MAIN ST., AKRON, OH 44311 (NAICS 333517). OSHA activity number 340028661.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rogers Industrial Products, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rogers Industrial Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
532 S. MAIN ST.
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44311
Mailing
532 S. MAIN ST., AKRON, OH 44311
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333517
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     On or about October 23, 2014, the employer failed to have a written respirator protection program for employees wearing a half face respirator to paint equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1050
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about October 23, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees wearing a half face respirator to paint equipment had a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   On or about October 23, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees wearing a half face respirator to paint equipment were FIT tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    On or about October 23, 204, the employer failed to ensure employees that perform maintenance on equipment such as but not limited to the 47.5 inch NRM auto-lock mandrel tire press have an effective lockout/tagout program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.179 G01 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(g)(1)(v): Pendant control box(es) were not constructed to prevent electrical shock:    On or about October 23, 2014, the employer failed to ensure the pendant control box of Bay 4 crane had all the control buttons covered to prevent accidental contact with 120VAC control voltage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.179 J02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:  On or about October 23, the employer failed to ensure certified hook inspections were performed and documented for the overhead crane in bay 4.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  On or about May 5 2014, the employer failed to ensure certified chain inspections were performed and documented for the  overhead crane in bay 4.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  On or about October 23, the employer failed to annual inspections were performed and documented for the overhead crane in bay 4.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    On or about October 23, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees operating a DeWalt angle grinder serial number 024099 were protected against accidental contact with the rotating blade due to a missing guard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):      On or about October 23, 2104, the employer failed to have a written HAZCOM program for employees working with chemicals such as but not limited to Safety-Kleen 105 Parts Washing Solvent, Grease-A-Way and SANDVIK chromium.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(i): The employer did not provide information to the employees on the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200:     On or about October 23, 2104, the employer failed to train employees working with chemicals such as but not limited to Safety-Kleen 105 Parts Washing Solvent, Grease-A-Way and SANDVIK chromium.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340028661.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.