Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. in 4940 CR 316, REDDICK, FL 32686 (NAICS 221121). OSHA activity number 340030428.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Duke Energy Florida, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Duke Energy Florida, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4940 CR 316
City
REDDICK
State
FL
ZIP
32686
Mailing
550 S. TYRON STREET, CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221121
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, and service rooms were not kept clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition:    a.   On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, on top of transformer number 2, tools and spray lubricants were left scattered on the working surface, exposing employees to a trip hazard in the vicinity of exposed electrical conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.269 O02 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(2)(ii):  Employees were not trained in safe work practices upon their initial assignment to the test area, with periodic reviews and updates provided as required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section:    a.   On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, employees assisting with Doble testing were not trained in safe work practices required for high voltage Doble transformer testing, and they had not received periodic reviews or updates.     b.   On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, employees assisting with Doble testing were not trained in safe work practices required for high voltage Doble transformer testing, and they had not received periodic reviews or updates.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.269 O04 V

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Aug 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(4)(v): A ground was not placed on the high-voltage terminal and other exposed terminals when the test area was entered after equipment was deenergized:    a.   On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, in the Doble test area, the bushing terminals of the number 2 transformer were not grounded between test runs, exposing the Test Operator Assistant to an electric shock hazard when working in the test area.    b.   On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, in the Doble test area, the bushing terminals of the number 2 transformer were not grounded between test runs, exposing the Test Operator Assistant to an electric shock hazard when working in the test area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.269 O06 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(6)(ii): The test operator in charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each series of tests to ensure required safety conditions:    a.   On or about October 13, 2014 at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the Test Operator and the Person-in-charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each test series including, but not limited to verifying that required personal protective equipment was in use near the Doble test set leads, transformer bushings, and terminal jumper wires, exposing employees to a 10 kilovolt, 300 milliamp electrocution hazard.    b.   On or about October 15, 2014 at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the Test Operator and the Person-in-charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each test series including, but not limited to verify that required personal protective equipment was in use near the Doble test set leads, transformer bushings, and terminal jumper wires, exposing employees to a 10 kilovolt, 300 milliamp electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.269 O05 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(5)(iv): A test observer, capable of implementing the immediate deenergizing of test circuits for safety purposes, was not present, and means for immediate deenergizing of the test circuit were not in effect when employees were present in the test area during testing:    a.   On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick, Florida Substation, in the Doble test area, during the excitation testing, a test observer had not present, and the Doble test extension safety interrupt buttons for immediate deenergizing of the Doble test set were defeated by taping one button and converting one to a footswitch, exposing employees to a 10,000-Volt, 0.3-Ampere electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $7000
  • · Z (W) $70000

1910.269 O03 IV

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Nov 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(3)(iv):   Guarding was not provided within test areas to control access to test equipment or to apparatus under test that may become energized as part of the testing by either direct or inductive coupling, in order to prevent accidental employee contact with energized parts:    a.   On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the test area was not barricaded to control access to the test equipment and transformer, exposing employees to an electrocution hazard by accidental contact with energized electrical parts that were conducting 10 Kilovolts and 300 milliamps.    b.   On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the test area was not barricaded to control access to the test equipment and transformer, exposing employees to an electrocution hazard by accidental contact with energized electrical parts that were conducting 10 Kilovolts and 300 milliamps.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Duke Energy Florida, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340030428.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.