REDDICK, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. in 4940 CR 316, REDDICK, FL 32686 (NAICS 221121). OSHA activity number 340030428.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
- Site address
- 4940 CR 316
- City
- REDDICK
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32686
- Mailing
- 550 S. TYRON STREET, CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221121
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, and service rooms were not kept clean and orderly and in a sanitary condition: a. On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, on top of transformer number 2, tools and spray lubricants were left scattered on the working surface, exposing employees to a trip hazard in the vicinity of exposed electrical conductors.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.269 O02 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(2)(ii): Employees were not trained in safe work practices upon their initial assignment to the test area, with periodic reviews and updates provided as required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section: a. On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, employees assisting with Doble testing were not trained in safe work practices required for high voltage Doble transformer testing, and they had not received periodic reviews or updates. b. On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, employees assisting with Doble testing were not trained in safe work practices required for high voltage Doble transformer testing, and they had not received periodic reviews or updates.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.269 O04 V
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(4)(v): A ground was not placed on the high-voltage terminal and other exposed terminals when the test area was entered after equipment was deenergized: a. On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, in the Doble test area, the bushing terminals of the number 2 transformer were not grounded between test runs, exposing the Test Operator Assistant to an electric shock hazard when working in the test area. b. On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Florida substation, in the Doble test area, the bushing terminals of the number 2 transformer were not grounded between test runs, exposing the Test Operator Assistant to an electric shock hazard when working in the test area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.269 O06 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(6)(ii): The test operator in charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each series of tests to ensure required safety conditions: a. On or about October 13, 2014 at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the Test Operator and the Person-in-charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each test series including, but not limited to verifying that required personal protective equipment was in use near the Doble test set leads, transformer bushings, and terminal jumper wires, exposing employees to a 10 kilovolt, 300 milliamp electrocution hazard. b. On or about October 15, 2014 at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the Test Operator and the Person-in-charge did not conduct routine safety checks before each test series including, but not limited to verify that required personal protective equipment was in use near the Doble test set leads, transformer bushings, and terminal jumper wires, exposing employees to a 10 kilovolt, 300 milliamp electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.269 O05 IV
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(5)(iv): A test observer, capable of implementing the immediate deenergizing of test circuits for safety purposes, was not present, and means for immediate deenergizing of the test circuit were not in effect when employees were present in the test area during testing: a. On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick, Florida Substation, in the Doble test area, during the excitation testing, a test observer had not present, and the Doble test extension safety interrupt buttons for immediate deenergizing of the Doble test set were defeated by taping one button and converting one to a footswitch, exposing employees to a 10,000-Volt, 0.3-Ampere electrocution hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7000
- · Z (W) $70000
1910.269 O03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2015
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(o)(3)(iv): Guarding was not provided within test areas to control access to test equipment or to apparatus under test that may become energized as part of the testing by either direct or inductive coupling, in order to prevent accidental employee contact with energized parts: a. On or about October 13, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the test area was not barricaded to control access to the test equipment and transformer, exposing employees to an electrocution hazard by accidental contact with energized electrical parts that were conducting 10 Kilovolts and 300 milliamps. b. On or about October 15, 2014, at the Reddick Substation, during Doble Testing, the test area was not barricaded to control access to the test equipment and transformer, exposing employees to an electrocution hazard by accidental contact with energized electrical parts that were conducting 10 Kilovolts and 300 milliamps.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Duke Energy Florida, INC.
View Duke Energy Florida, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221121)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340030428.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.