Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R & D MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of R & D MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC. in 53 LOCK & DAM ROAD, DENNIS, MS 38838 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 340031095.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R & D Maintenance Services INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R & D Maintenance Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
53 LOCK & DAM ROAD
City
DENNIS
State
MS
ZIP
38838
Mailing
53 LOCK & DAM ROAD, DENNIS, MS 38838
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a fall hazard.     (a) Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 employer did not conduct sufficiently frequent inspections of crane safety devices in that it failed to perform a daily crane load test before allowing employees to work from a man basket attached to the crane.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $2000
  • — C (S) $3825
  • — Z (S) $3825

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 24, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to a fall hazard:    (a) Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 employer did not have documentation of a practical test for an employee that signals the Terex RT230 Telescoping Boom Crane.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.     (a) Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 employees used a crane supported work platform that did not have overhead protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $3060
  • — Z (S) $3060

1910.23 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(iii): Flight(s) of stairs with 4 or more risers, less than 44 inches wide and having both sides open were not equipped with one standard stair railing on each side:     (a) Generator - On or about October 21, 2014 the 4 rung x 36 inch wide x 33 inch high stairway was missing the stair railing on the left side and the mid rail on the right side of the stairs.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $500
  • — C (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $2295

1910.147 C04 II C

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.   Tainter Valve - On or about October 21, 2014 the written hazardous energy control program did not include the tagout procedure for the Tainter valve.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $4,000
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(3)(ii): In demonstrating that a level of safety is achieved in the tagout program which is equivalent to the level of safety obtained by using a lockout program, the employer shall demonstrate full compliance with all tagout-related provisions of this standard together with such additional elements as are necessary to provide the equivalent safety available from the use of a lockout device. Additional means to be considered as part of the demonstration of full employee protection shall include the implementation of additional safety measures such as the removal of an isolating circuit element, blocking of a controlling switch, opening of an extra disconnecting device, or the removal of a valve handle to reduce the likelihood of inadvertent energization.     (a) Control Tower Office - On or about October 21, 2014 a key switch was turned to the out of service position at the upstream left wall tainter valve control. The key was tagged but remained in the switch.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:   (a) Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 the periodic inspection of lockout/tagout procedures were not conducted.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.180 D06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.180(d)(6): "Inspection records." Certification records which include the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the crane which was inspected shall be made monthly on critical items in use such as brakes, crane hooks, and ropes. This certification record shall be kept readily available.     Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 a monthly inspection of the Terex RT 230 crane was not completed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2500
  • — C (S) $3825
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.184 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,295 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(f)(1): Wire-rope slings did not  have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer  that indicated the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es) used, the angle upon which it is based, and the number of legs if more than one:     (a) Jobsite - On or about October 21, 2014 the wire-rope slings used on a man basket did not have identification markings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $500
  • — C (S) $2295
  • — Z (S) $2295

View R & D Maintenance Services INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340031095.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.