GAHANNA, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE PINTO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE PINTO in 765 CROSS POINT ROAD, GAHANNA, OH 43230 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340033745.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE PINTO
- Site address
- 765 CROSS POINT ROAD
- City
- GAHANNA
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43230
- Mailing
- 1027 SMITH ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: a. The employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, November 27, 2014, for a violation of 29 CFR 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), issued as citation 1, item 3, and described as follows: Employees were observed working on the top level of an apartment building with open side without fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous. a. The three extension cords that were plugged into the generator were all missing grounding pins. The employees were exposed to an electrocution hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided. Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage. a. The flexible cord had the external insulation stripped away in a 2 inch section of extension cord exposing the internal wires. The employees were exposed to contact with electrical current.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. Employees were observed working on the top level of an apartment building with open side without fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Jose Pinto
View Jose Pinto's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340033745.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.