Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION in 402 E YAKIMA AVE, SUITE 900, YAKIMA, WA 98901 (NAICS 922190). OSHA activity number 340033760.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Drug Enforcement Administration — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Drug Enforcement Administration is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
402 E YAKIMA AVE, SUITE 900
City
YAKIMA
State
WA
ZIP
98901
Mailing
402 E YAKIMA AVE, SUITE 900, YAKIMA, WA 98901
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
922190
Employees
15
Ownership type
D

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  a)       An outlet was missing its cover on the wall adjacent to the Sergeants desk.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  a)      Government Vehicles;  Portable fire extinguishers were not inspected on a monthly basis, and they were available for use to put out incipient vehicular fires.  The Drug Enforcement Administration was previously cited for a violation of this standard which was contained in OSHA inspection no. 951564 citation 1, item 1b, issued on December 17, 2013 with respect to a workplace at Tacoma, WA.   The Drug Enforcement Administration was previously cited for a violation of this standard which was contained in OSHA inspection no. 950508 citation 3, item 2b, issued on December 10, 2013 with respect to a workplace at Seattle, WA.   The Drug Enforcement Administration was previously cited for a violation of this standard which was contained in OSHA inspection no. 314898495 citation 2, item 2b, issued on February 15, 2011 with respect to a workplace at Bellingham, WA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.157 G02

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  a)  Office Suite and Government Vehicles; Initial fire extinguisher training had not been provided when fire extinguishers were available for use and employees could potentially fight incipient stage fires.  The Drug Enforcement Administration was previously cited for a violation of this standard which was contained in OSHA inspection no. 951564 citation 1, item 1c, issued on December 17, 2013 with respect to a workplace at Tacoma, WA.  The Drug Enforcement Administration was previously cited for a violation of this standard which was contained in OSHA inspection no. 950508 citation 3, item 2c, issued on December 10, 2013 with respect to a workplace at Seattle, WA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2014
Abate by
Jan 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  a)       The back door did not have an EXIT sign and it was designated as an exit door on the evacuation plan.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Drug Enforcement Administration's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340033760.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.