PEKIN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: LES BENNETT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LES BENNETT in 910 SOUTH 5TH ST., PEKIN, IL 61554 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340049451.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LES BENNETT
- Site address
- 910 SOUTH 5TH ST.
- City
- PEKIN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61554
- Mailing
- 323 HENRIETTA LANE, PEKIN, IL 61554
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2015
- Abate by
- May 24, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On February 6, 2015, Les Bennett Construction, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 1a & b b. Citation 1 Item 2a & b
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): An employee was exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing activities and the employer did not ensure that that appropriate fall protection was utilized.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while performing roofing activities without fall protection in place and were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): The side rails of portable ladders used for access did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, and was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect and a grasping devise was not provided to assist employees mounting and dismounting the ladder. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while accessing a porch roof from a portable ladder. The ladder used to access the roof did not extend three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, the top of the ladder was not secured to a rigid support and a grasping device was not provided to aid in mounting a dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while accessing a porch roof from a portable ladder. The ladder used to access the roof did not extend three (3) feet above the upper landing surface, the top of the ladder was not secured to a rigid support and a grasping device was not provided to aid in mounting a dismounting the ladder. The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340049451.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.