Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: PLASTIC PARTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PLASTIC PARTS, INC. in 1300 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD., UNION GROVE, WI 53182 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 340051580.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Plastic Parts, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Plastic Parts, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PLASTIC PARTS, INC.
Site address
1300 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD.
City
UNION GROVE
State
WI
ZIP
53182
Mailing
1300 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD., UNION GROVE, WI 53182
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 5 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 9, 2016
Abate by
Feb 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  The employer failed to provide certification of abatement on each of the cited items:      a)  Lock Out/Tag Out procedures for controlling the hazardous energy on the injection molding machines.     b)  Annual Certification of periodic inspections of the energy control procedures that are performed.     c)  Adequate completion of the OSHA Form 300.     d)  Creation, implementation and maintenance of a hazard assessment for the facility.      e)  Hazard Communication training on safety data sheets and the labeling system, for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $595

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $2,083 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a) The employer did not develop, document, and implement procedures for controlling hazardous energy on the injection molding machines. This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2082.5
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:  (a) The employer failed to evaluate authorized employees at least annually to ensure the procedures for control of hazardous energy were being followed.  This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 29 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $595 · Current $417 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation.   The employer did not complete the OSHA Form 300 as required;   (a) In that column F of the 2014 Log did not contain the object/substance which directly injured or made the employee ill,  (b) And the number of days away (column K) and restricted days (column L) were not completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $416.5
  • · Z (O) $595

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 29 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a) The employer did not ensure that the hazard assessment for the facility was certified with the name of the person conducting the assessment, the location being assessed, and the date of the assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Jul 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  (a) The employer did not provide employees with training on the safety data sheets and the labeling system, including the pictograms and signal word.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Plastic Parts, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340051580.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.