BELLINGHAM, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: ACE TORWELL INC
Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of ACE TORWELL INC in 125 DEPOT STREET, BELLINGHAM, MA 02019 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 340051838.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ACE TORWELL INC
- Site address
- 125 DEPOT STREET
- City
- BELLINGHAM
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02019
- Mailing
- 125 DEPOT STREET, BELLINGHAM, MA 02019
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333318
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Location: Shop: The powered industrial truck operators were allowed to operate a forklift without having received formal instruction, including operator evaluation to determine the retention of the information.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch: Location: Shop: The work rest on the Delta grinder was set at over 1/2" from the wheel while an employee was sharpening a drill bit.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer did not determine, in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section, the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI) Location: Fabrication Shop: The employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1026 K01 I A
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year: LOCATION: Shop: The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who were exposed to chromium VI above the action level. An employee was exposed to 0.0052mg/m3 TWA, and the action level is 0.0025mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1026 L01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200: Location: Company Wide: The employer did not provide training to the welder and plasma torch operator working with and exposed to chromium (VI) as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 1910.1200(e)(1): At this establishment, the employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program for which describes how the criteria specified in 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, metal fumes generated during welding operations and plasma cutting. Location: Fabrication Shop: The employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program, including training, SDS and labeling for materials including but not limited to; various metal fumes including manganese, nickel, chromium, iron and beryllium, hexavalent chromium and compressed gasses including argon, carbon dioxide, acetylene and nitrogen.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333318)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340051838.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.