Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACE TORWELL INC

Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of ACE TORWELL INC in 125 DEPOT STREET, BELLINGHAM, MA 02019 (NAICS 333318). OSHA activity number 340051838.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ACE Torwell INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ACE Torwell INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ACE TORWELL INC
Site address
125 DEPOT STREET
City
BELLINGHAM
State
MA
ZIP
02019
Mailing
125 DEPOT STREET, BELLINGHAM, MA 02019
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333318
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Mar 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Location: Shop:                     The powered industrial truck operators were allowed to operate a forklift without having received formal instruction, including operator evaluation to determine the retention of the information.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch:     Location: Shop:    The work rest on the Delta grinder was set at over 1/2" from the wheel while an employee was sharpening a drill bit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer did not determine, in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section,  the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI)      Location: Fabrication Shop:    The employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1026 K01 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year:    LOCATION: Shop:    The employer did not make medical surveillance available for employees who were exposed to chromium VI above the action level. An employee was exposed to 0.0052mg/m3 TWA, and the action level is 0.0025mg/m3.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1026 L01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200:    Location: Company Wide:    The employer did not provide training to the welder and plasma torch operator working with and exposed to chromium (VI) as required by the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1960
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 1910.1200(e)(1): At this establishment, the employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program for which describes how the criteria specified in 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, metal fumes generated during welding operations and plasma cutting.     Location: Fabrication Shop:    The employer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program, including training, SDS and labeling for materials including but not limited to; various metal fumes including manganese, nickel, chromium, iron and beryllium, hexavalent chromium and compressed gasses including argon, carbon dioxide, acetylene and nitrogen.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340051838.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.