Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: FAIFER & COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FAIFER & COMPANY, INC. in 6850 US HIGHWAY 181 N, FLORESVILLE, TX 78114 (NAICS 333210). OSHA activity number 340053974.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Faifer & Company, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Faifer & Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6850 US HIGHWAY 181 N
City
FLORESVILLE
State
TX
ZIP
78114
Mailing
6850 US HIGHWAY 181 N, FLORESVILLE, TX 78114
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333210
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about October 31, 2014, at this site, specific procedures were not developed for multi-energy sourced equipment such as, but not limited to the SCMI planer, Baker Band Resaw and the bigger Baker Band Resaw. At a minimum, the machines have pneumatic and electrical energy sources. Employee(s) exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the machines.    1. SCMI planer, model number 3/S RCS110.   2. Baker Band Resaw, serial number 04-3379  3. Baker Band Resaw (bigger one), serial number 06-3744.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  On or about October 31, 2014, at this site, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  On or about October 31, 2014, at this site, employees did not receive training on the recognition of the hazardous energy sources and the means necessary for energy isolation and control for equipment such as, but not limited to the SCMI planer and the two Baker Band Resaws. Employee(s) exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the machines.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about October 31, 2014, in the shop area, the rotating chuck on the Dayton drill press was not guarded. Employee (s) exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating drill. Dayton drill press, 17-inch, Model number 3Z918F.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Dec 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:  On or about October 31, 2014, in the shop area, the Dayton drill press was not anchored to the floor. Employee (s) exposed to the hazard of being struck by the press. Dayton drill press, 17-inch, Model number 3Z918F.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.213 H01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1): The sides of the lower exposed portion of the blade of radial saw(s) were not guarded to the full diameter of the blade by a device that automatically adjusted itself to the thickness of the stock and remained in contact with the with stock being cut to give maximum protection possible for the operation being performed:    On or about October 31, 2014, in the shop area, there were two Delta radial arm saws that did not have adjustable lower blade guards. Employee(s) exposed to an amputation hazard from the unguarded saw blade.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.213 H04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2014
Abate by
Dec 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4): Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator:  On or about October 31, 2014, in the shop area, there were two Delta radial arm saws that did not return to the starting position when released. Employee(s) exposed to an amputation hazard from the radial arm saw not returning to the starting position.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340053974.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.