JANESVILLE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: TIGRE-ADS USA, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TIGRE-ADS USA, INC. in 2315 BELOIT AVENUE, JANESVILLE, WI 53548 (NAICS 326121). OSHA activity number 340054006.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TIGRE-ADS USA, INC.
- Site address
- 2315 BELOIT AVENUE
- City
- JANESVILLE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53548
- Mailing
- 2315 BELOIT AVENUE, JANESVILLE, WI 53546
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326121
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,310 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about October 30, 2014, the employer had not developed nor implemented a written respiratory program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2310
1910.134 C03
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(3): The employer shall designate a program administrator who is qualified by appropriate training or experience that is commensurate with the complexity of the program to administer or oversee the respiratory protection program and conduct the required evaluations of program effectiveness: On or about October 30, 2014, the employer had not designated a qualified program administrator of the respiratory program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,310 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: On or about October 30, 2014, the operator of the PVC grinder was wearing a respirator that was inappropriate for the air hazards to which he was exposed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2310
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about October 30, 2014, an employee operating a PVC compound grinder was wearing a half-mask, tight-fitting respirator as required by the employer, but had not been medically evaluated for respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about October 30, 2014, the employer did not perform a fit-testing for the respirator of the PVC Grinder Operator before he used the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01 VII
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,310 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134: On or about October 30, 2014, the employer required the wearing of a respirator by the PVC compound grinder operator prior to his receiving training on the required elements of the standard including, but not limited to, donning and removing respirators, any imitations on their use, their maintenance and storage, how to inspect the seals, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2310
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,850 · Current $1,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about October 30, 2014, employee(s) operating plastic injection molding machine #19 were exposed to the hazard of the cycling ram where the front guard (door) had openings which could allow the guard to be easily defeated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1920
- — Z (S) $3850
More inspections at Tigre-Ads USA, INC.
View Tigre-Ads USA, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326121)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340054006.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.