Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: BRANDEL E. DAVIS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRANDEL E. DAVIS in 302 BROADWAY, RAYNHAM, MA 02767 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340055383.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brandel E. Davis for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brandel E. Davis is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRANDEL E. DAVIS
Site address
302 BROADWAY
City
RAYNHAM
State
MA
ZIP
02767
Mailing
56 SOUTHERN AVENUE, DORCHESTER, MA 02124
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2015
Abate by
Jul 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  The Employer did not furnish the abatement required for the Citation issued within 10 calendar days, nor did they respond to the written request for abatement certification which was sent May 27, 2015.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b)  Location: Jobsite  Workers were exposed to falls up to 10' to the ground below while working where fall protection had not been used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 2, 2014
Abate by
Jan 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii)  Location: Jobsite  Workers were exposed to falls up to 10 feet to the ground below while working where fall protection training had not been provided.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340055383.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.