RAYNHAM, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: BRANDEL E. DAVIS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRANDEL E. DAVIS in 302 BROADWAY, RAYNHAM, MA 02767 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340055383.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRANDEL E. DAVIS
- Site address
- 302 BROADWAY
- City
- RAYNHAM
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02767
- Mailing
- 56 SOUTHERN AVENUE, DORCHESTER, MA 02124
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: The Employer did not furnish the abatement required for the Citation issued within 10 calendar days, nor did they respond to the written request for abatement certification which was sent May 27, 2015.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b) Location: Jobsite Workers were exposed to falls up to 10' to the ground below while working where fall protection had not been used.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Dec 2, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Location: Jobsite Workers were exposed to falls up to 10 feet to the ground below while working where fall protection training had not been provided.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340055383.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.