BOSTON, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: BOSTON GIN COMPANY
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of BOSTON GIN COMPANY in 18475 US HWY. 84 E, BOSTON, GA 31626 (NAICS 115111). OSHA activity number 340058965.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOSTON GIN COMPANY
- Site address
- 18475 US HWY. 84 E
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31626
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 340, BOSTON, GA 31626
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 115111
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: the employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Transfer Truck Loading Area- On or about November 03, 2014, employees who were working while standing underneath a cotton seed hopper where the material was released into a dump trailer were exposed to engulfment hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4900
- · Z (S) $4900
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: the employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Transfer Truck Loading Area- On or about November 03, 2014, employees who were working while standing on steel beams adjacent to a cotton seed hopper were exposed to fall hazards of about 13.5 feet onto the ground. b) By module feeder - On or about November 03, 2014, the stairway leading to the up-stairs office did not have a mid-rail in place, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to 15.0 feet onto the concrete floor. c) At the facility - On or about November 03, 2014, the guardrail system surrounding the stairway leading to the pit/basement area did not have a mid-rail in place, exposing employees to fall hazards of about 8 feet onto the concrete floor. d) At the facility - On or about November 03, 2014, numerous platforms within the cotton ginning equipment were missing mid-rails, exposing employees to fall hazards from 8 - 25 feet onto the concrete floor.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4900
- · Z (S) $4900
1928.57 D01 IV
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(d)(1)(iv): 29 CFR 1928.57(d)(1)(iv): Pulleys of V-belt drives were not completely enclosed or guarded by location whether or not railings are present. The open end of the pulley guard shall be not less than 4 inches from the periphery of the pulleys. a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, the employer allowed operators and others to work near the unguarded belt and pulley of the burner/fan, exposing employees to entanglement and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4900
- · Z (S) $4900
1928.57 D01 V
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1928.57(d)(1)(v): Chains and sprockets were not completely enclosed: a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, the employer allowed operators and others to work near the unguarded chains and sprockets (underneath the catwalk and on the side close to the back portion) of the module feeder, exposing employees to entanglement and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, the employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees that were handling/working with chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, oxygen, acetylene, and cotton, exposing employees to eye/face and/or skin injuries and irritations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $400
- · Z (O) $400
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, safety data sheets were not maintained and available for the chemicals used on site such as, but not limited to propane, oxygen, acetylene, and cotton, exposing employees to eye/face and/or skin injuries and irritations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, the employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, oxygen, acetylene, and cotton at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Training provided by the employer did not include the details of the employer's hazard communication program, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain; and use the appropriate hazard information. a) At the facility - On or about and at times prior to November 3, 2014, the employer did not provide training pursuant to the Hazard Communication 2012 updates effective December 1, 2013 about the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, the labeling system for received containers, safety data sheets and on how employees can obtain/use the appropriate hazard information for employees working with chemicals such as, but not limited to propane, oxygen, acetylene, and cotton, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 115111)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340058965.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.